HXQ.TO vs. XEI.TO
HXQ.TO (Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF) and XEI.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while XEI.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HXQ.TO returned 22.56%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for XEI.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HXQ.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for XEI.TO.
Performance
HXQ.TO vs. XEI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HXQ.TO having a 22.53% return and XEI.TO slightly lower at 22.21%. Over the past 10 years, HXQ.TO has outperformed XEI.TO with an annualized return of 22.56%, while XEI.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.32% annualized return.
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 12.65%
- YTD
- 22.53%
- 6M
- 18.96%
- 1Y
- 44.49%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 21.43%
- 10Y*
- 22.56%
XEI.TO
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 22.21%
- 6M
- 23.91%
- 1Y
- 44.20%
- 3Y*
- 22.26%
- 5Y*
- 15.69%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
HXQ.TO vs. XEI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 22.53% | 15.05% | 35.98% | 51.16% | -27.84% | 26.20% | 45.58% | 32.26% | 6.71% | 23.12% |
XEI.TO iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF | 22.21% | 25.96% | 15.42% | 6.69% | 0.41% | 35.88% | -7.53% | 25.44% | -10.85% | 7.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXQ.TO and XEI.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2016 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HXQ.TO and XEI.TO has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HXQ.TO vs. XEI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXQ.TO
XEI.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
HXQ.TO
XEI.TO
Communication Services
HXQ.TO
XEI.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HXQ.TO
XEI.TO
Healthcare
HXQ.TO
XEI.TO
Consumer Defensive
HXQ.TO
XEI.TO
Industrials
HXQ.TO
XEI.TO
Utilities
HXQ.TO
XEI.TO
Basic Materials
HXQ.TO
XEI.TO
Energy
HXQ.TO
XEI.TO
Financial Services
HXQ.TO
XEI.TO
Real Estate
HXQ.TO
XEI.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXQ.TO vs. XEI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXQ.TO
XEI.TO
HXQ.TO vs. XEI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXQ.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.86 | 6.16 | -3.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.72 | 9.17 | -5.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 2.29 | -0.79 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 20.05 | -16.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.73 | 68.19 | -56.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXQ.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 6.16 | -3.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 1.40 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.09 | 0.77 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.67 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
HXQ.TO vs. XEI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, smaller than the maximum XEI.TO drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and XEI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXQ.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.60% | -45.51% | +13.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -2.24% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -9.92% | -12.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.60% | -17.32% | -14.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | -45.51% | +13.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.76% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -5.05% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 0.66% | +3.20% |
Volatility
HXQ.TO vs. XEI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) at 2.88%. This indicates that HXQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXQ.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | 2.88% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | 6.01% | +5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 7.22% | +8.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 11.24% | +9.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 16.01% | +4.82% |
HXQ.TO vs. XEI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XEI.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXQ.TO vs. XEI.TO - Dividend Comparison
HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEI.TO iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF | 3.56% | 4.39% | 5.56% | 5.08% | 4.78% | 3.65% | 5.13% | 4.71% | 5.53% | 4.37% | 4.51% | 5.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HXQ.TO and XEI.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEI.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEI.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXQ.TO.
HXQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XEI.TO is Canada Equities. HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XEI.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.22% for XEI.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and XEI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer