HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO
HXQ.TO (Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF) and XEF-U.TO (iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while XEF-U.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE® Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXQ.TO returned 21.43%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for XEF-U.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HXQ.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for XEF-U.TO.
Performance
HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HXQ.TO is traded in CAD, while XEF-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XEF-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXQ.TO achieves a 22.53% return, which is significantly higher than XEF-U.TO's 10.22% return.
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 12.65%
- YTD
- 22.53%
- 6M
- 18.96%
- 1Y
- 44.49%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 21.43%
- 10Y*
- 22.56%
XEF-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 11.30%
- 1Y
- 22.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- —
HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 22.53% | 15.05% | 35.98% | 51.16% | -27.84% | 26.20% | 45.58% | 7.52% |
XEF-U.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 10.22% | 25.22% | 11.01% | 13.32% | -9.54% | 9.81% | 6.64% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXQ.TO and XEF-U.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, HXQ.TO and XEF-U.TO have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXQ.TO
XEF-U.TO
HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXQ.TO | XEF-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.86 | 1.56 | +1.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.72 | 2.18 | +1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.29 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 1.96 | +1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.73 | 7.89 | +3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXQ.TO | XEF-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 1.56 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 0.92 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.92 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, which is greater than XEF-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and XEF-U.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXQ.TO | XEF-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.60% | -27.28% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -11.37% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -13.81% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.60% | -25.05% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.56% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -3.90% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 2.81% | +1.05% |
Volatility
HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) is 4.66%, while iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that HXQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEF-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXQ.TO | XEF-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | 5.11% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | 11.82% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 14.27% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 17.81% | +2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 20.35% | +0.48% |
HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XEF-U.TO's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEF-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEF-U.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 1.62% | 1.77% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 2.27% | 1.94% | 1.41% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HXQ.TO and XEF-U.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEF-U.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEF-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXQ.TO.
HXQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XEF-U.TO is Global Equities. HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XEF-U.TO tracks MSCI EAFE® Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.21% for XEF-U.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and XEF-U.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer