PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HXQ.TO is traded in CAD, while XEF-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XEF-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXQ.TO achieves a 22.53% return, which is significantly higher than XEF-U.TO's 10.22% return.


HXQ.TO

1D
0.48%
1M
12.65%
YTD
22.53%
6M
18.96%
1Y
44.49%
3Y*
29.97%
5Y*
21.43%
10Y*
22.56%

XEF-U.TO

1D
0.51%
1M
4.21%
YTD
10.22%
6M
11.30%
1Y
22.00%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF
22.53%15.05%35.98%51.16%-27.84%26.20%45.58%7.52%
XEF-U.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
10.22%25.22%11.01%13.32%-9.54%9.81%6.64%2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between HXQ.TO and XEF-U.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019

0.27

Over the past year, HXQ.TO and XEF-U.TO have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXQ.TO
HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

XEF-U.TO
XEF-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XEF-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEF-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEF-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XEF-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEF-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXQ.TOXEF-U.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.86

1.56

+1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.72

2.18

+1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.29

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

1.96

+1.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.73

7.89

+3.83

HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the XEF-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXQ.TO and XEF-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXQ.TOXEF-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

1.56

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.92

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.92

+0.16

Drawdowns

HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, which is greater than XEF-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and XEF-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXQ.TOXEF-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.60%

-27.28%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-11.37%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-13.81%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.60%

-25.05%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.56%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-3.90%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

2.81%

+1.05%

Volatility

HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) is 4.66%, while iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that HXQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEF-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXQ.TOXEF-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

5.11%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

11.82%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

14.27%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

17.81%

+2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.83%

20.35%

+0.48%

HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XEF-U.TO's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HXQ.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEF-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEF-U.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
1.62%1.77%2.05%2.09%2.27%1.94%1.41%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


HXQ.TO and XEF-U.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEF-U.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEF-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXQ.TO.

HXQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XEF-U.TO is Global Equities. HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XEF-U.TO tracks MSCI EAFE® Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.21% for XEF-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and XEF-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer