PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXQ.TO vs. HXT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXQ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXQ.TO achieves a 19.67% return, which is significantly higher than HXT.TO's 11.19% return. Over the past 10 years, HXQ.TO has outperformed HXT.TO with an annualized return of 22.27%, while HXT.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.12% annualized return.


HXQ.TO

1D
0.78%
1M
3.00%
YTD
19.67%
6M
19.59%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
28.29%
5Y*
19.92%
10Y*
22.27%

HXT.TO

1D
0.62%
1M
4.35%
YTD
11.19%
6M
11.91%
1Y
32.21%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
14.58%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXQ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF
19.67%15.05%35.98%51.16%-27.84%26.20%45.58%32.26%6.71%23.12%
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
11.19%28.74%20.94%12.02%-6.27%28.11%5.36%22.18%-7.89%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HXQ.TO and HXT.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016

0.50

The correlation between HXQ.TO and HXT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXQ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXQ.TO
HXT.TO

Technology

55.9%
12.0%

Communication Services

15.8%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
3.9%

Healthcare

4.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
3.6%

Industrials

3.1%
8.9%

Utilities

1.4%
2.9%

Basic Materials

1.0%
12.6%

Energy

0.5%
15.9%

Financial Services

0.3%
37.3%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.5%

Technology

HXQ.TO
55.9%
HXT.TO
12.0%

Communication Services

HXQ.TO
15.8%
HXT.TO
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HXQ.TO
13.2%
HXT.TO
3.9%

Healthcare

HXQ.TO
4.4%
HXT.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HXQ.TO
4.4%
HXT.TO
3.6%

Industrials

HXQ.TO
3.1%
HXT.TO
8.9%

Utilities

HXQ.TO
1.4%
HXT.TO
2.9%

Basic Materials

HXQ.TO
1.0%
HXT.TO
12.6%

Energy

HXQ.TO
0.5%
HXT.TO
15.9%

Financial Services

HXQ.TO
0.3%
HXT.TO
37.3%

Real Estate

HXQ.TO
0.2%
HXT.TO
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXQ.TO vs. HXT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXQ.TO
HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

HXT.TO
HXT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXQ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HXQ.TOHXT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.49

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

4.20

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.12

19.34

-9.22

HXQ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXQ.TO and HXT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HXQ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, smaller than the maximum HXT.TO drawdown of -52.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and HXT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXQ.TOHXT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.60%

-52.13%

+20.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-7.71%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-12.36%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.60%

-16.33%

-15.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-35.48%

+3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-0.22%

-2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-19.06%

+13.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

1.67%

+2.24%

Volatility

HXQ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) at 3.94%. This indicates that HXQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXQ.TOHXT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

3.94%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

9.57%

+3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

11.98%

+4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

12.80%

+8.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.92%

15.17%

+5.75%

HXQ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HXT.TO's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HXQ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HXQ.TO nor HXT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HXQ.TO and HXT.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXT.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXT.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXQ.TO.

HXQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while HXT.TO is Canada Equities. HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while HXT.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.07% for HXT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and HXT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer