PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXQ.TO vs. GBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXQ.TO vs. GBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HXQ.TO is traded in CAD, while GBTC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GBTC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXQ.TO achieves a 20.53% return, which is significantly higher than GBTC's -26.88% return. Over the past 10 years, HXQ.TO has underperformed GBTC with an annualized return of 22.49%, while GBTC has yielded a comparatively higher 46.31% annualized return.


HXQ.TO

1D
-2.86%
1M
2.47%
YTD
20.53%
6M
19.26%
1Y
39.36%
3Y*
29.01%
5Y*
19.15%
10Y*
22.49%

GBTC

1D
-3.33%
1M
-15.56%
YTD
-26.88%
6M
-27.31%
1Y
-38.71%
3Y*
39.48%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
46.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXQ.TO vs. GBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF
20.53%15.05%35.98%51.16%-27.84%26.20%45.58%32.26%6.71%23.12%
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
-26.88%-11.86%131.91%307.68%-74.26%6.98%281.45%98.04%-80.60%1,659.90%

Correlation

The correlation between HXQ.TO and GBTC is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016

0.22

The correlation between HXQ.TO and GBTC shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXQ.TO vs. GBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXQ.TO
HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GBTC
GBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXQ.TO vs. GBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HXQ.TOGBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.87

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

-0.74

+3.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.07

-1.24

+11.30

HXQ.TO vs. GBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the GBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXQ.TO and GBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HXQ.TO vs. GBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, smaller than the maximum GBTC drawdown of -89.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and GBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXQ.TOGBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.60%

-89.71%

+58.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-52.65%

+40.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-52.65%

+30.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.60%

-84.15%

+52.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-89.71%

+58.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-50.20%

+47.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-42.96%

+37.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

31.36%

-27.44%

Volatility

HXQ.TO vs. GBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) is 8.43%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that HXQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXQ.TOGBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

12.99%

-4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

34.60%

-20.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.40%

44.47%

-27.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.03%

62.50%

-41.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.99%

81.88%

-60.89%

HXQ.TO vs. GBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GBTC's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HXQ.TO vs. GBTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither HXQ.TO nor GBTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.61%
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HXQ.TO and GBTC have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GBTC.

HXQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GBTC is Cryptocurrency. HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while GBTC tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 1.50% for GBTC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and GBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer