HXQ.TO vs. CHPS
HXQ.TO (Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HXQ.TO returned 24.20%/yr vs 49.42%/yr for CHPS. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HXQ.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HXQ.TO is traded in CAD, while CHPS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CHPS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXQ.TO achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 72.39% return.
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- 6M
- 14.12%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 26.47%
- 3Y*
- 24.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.11%
CHPS
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -14.28%
- 6M
- 47.69%
- YTD
- 72.39%
- 1Y
- 140.57%
- 3Y*
- 49.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 49.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$3.24M | CA$3.49M | CA$5.39M | |
| CA$2.97M | CA$3.02M | CA$3.91M |
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HXQ.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF | 14.56% | 15.05% | 35.98% | 10.77% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 72.39% | 51.23% | 16.87% | 11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXQ.TO and CHPS is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between HXQ.TO and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXQ.TO
CHPS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
HXQ.TO
CHPS
Communication Services
HXQ.TO
CHPS
Consumer Cyclical
HXQ.TO
CHPS
Healthcare
HXQ.TO
CHPS
-
Consumer Defensive
HXQ.TO
CHPS
Industrials
HXQ.TO
CHPS
Utilities
HXQ.TO
CHPS
-
Basic Materials
HXQ.TO
CHPS
-
Energy
HXQ.TO
CHPS
Financial Services
HXQ.TO
CHPS
Real Estate
HXQ.TO
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
HXQ.TO
CHPS
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HXQ.TO | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.43 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 4.19 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 18.02 | -12.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -36.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXQ.TO | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.60% | -36.74% | +5.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -33.07% | +20.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -36.74% | +14.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.80% | -26.85% | +19.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -8.39% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 7.68% | -3.38% |
Volatility
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) is 6.71%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 19.59%. This indicates that HXQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXQ.TO | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 19.59% | -12.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.67% | 40.63% | -24.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 45.84% | -26.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 37.57% | -16.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 37.57% | -16.50% |
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.39% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
HXQ.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HXQ.TO and CHPS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXQ.TO.
HXQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CHPS is Semiconductors. HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.15% for CHPS.
Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer