HXH.TO vs. QCE.TO
HXH.TO (Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF) and QCE.TO (Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - HXH.TO tracks the Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index while QCE.TO tracks the Solactive Canada Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXH.TO returned 17.45%/yr vs 15.31%/yr for QCE.TO. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HXH.TO charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for QCE.TO.
Performance
HXH.TO vs. QCE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXH.TO achieves a 25.25% return, which is significantly higher than QCE.TO's 14.37% return.
HXH.TO
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 21.03%
- YTD
- 25.25%
- 1Y
- 42.71%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.39%
QCE.TO
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 33.86%
- 3Y*
- 23.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.31%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$171.87K | CA$164.71K | CA$187.22K | |
| CA$55.32K | CA$69.28K | CA$101.71K |
HXH.TO vs. QCE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXH.TO Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF | 25.25% | 25.86% | 15.24% | 6.33% | 5.00% | 34.51% | -7.66% | 22.17% | -14.49% |
QCE.TO Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 14.37% | 29.43% | 21.54% | 12.44% | -6.08% | 24.89% | 4.28% | 22.10% | -7.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXH.TO and QCE.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2018 | 0.41 |
The correlation between HXH.TO and QCE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HXH.TO vs. QCE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXH.TO
QCE.TO
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
HXH.TO
QCE.TO
-
Basic Materials
HXH.TO
-
QCE.TO
Communication Services
HXH.TO
-
QCE.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HXH.TO
-
QCE.TO
Consumer Defensive
HXH.TO
-
QCE.TO
Energy
HXH.TO
-
QCE.TO
Financial Services
HXH.TO
-
QCE.TO
Healthcare
HXH.TO
-
QCE.TO
-
Industrials
HXH.TO
-
QCE.TO
Technology
HXH.TO
-
QCE.TO
Utilities
HXH.TO
-
QCE.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXH.TO vs. QCE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXH.TO
QCE.TO
HXH.TO vs. QCE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QCE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HXH.TO | QCE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.99 | 1.52 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.64 | 4.38 | +12.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.99 | 18.51 | +31.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HXH.TO vs. QCE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXH.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.80%, which is greater than QCE.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXH.TO and QCE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXH.TO | QCE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.80% | -35.47% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.52% | -7.54% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.55% | -12.48% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.48% | -16.27% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -0.81% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -3.66% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 1.78% | -0.94% |
Volatility
HXH.TO vs. QCE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QCE.TO) at 2.54%. This indicates that HXH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXH.TO | QCE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 2.54% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.55% | 8.37% | -1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.63% | 11.60% | -2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.09% | 12.87% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 15.76% | +0.25% |
HXH.TO vs. QCE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXH.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than QCE.TO's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXH.TO vs. QCE.TO - Dividend Comparison
HXH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXH.TO Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCE.TO Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 2.03% | 2.30% | 3.01% | 3.49% | 3.38% | 2.57% | 3.17% | 3.18% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HXH.TO and QCE.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QCE.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QCE.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for HXH.TO.
HXH.TO tracks Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index, while QCE.TO tracks Solactive Canada Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for HXH.TO and 0.04% for QCE.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXH.TO and QCE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer