HXF.TO vs. ZUB.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HXF.TO (Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF) and ZUB.TO (BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HXF.TO returned 16.29%/yr vs 11.16%/yr for ZUB.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HXF.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) and BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXF.TO achieves a 26.34% return, which is significantly higher than ZUB.TO's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, HXF.TO has outperformed ZUB.TO with an annualized return of 16.29%, while ZUB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.16% annualized return.

HXF.TO

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: 7.41%
• 6M: 25.83%
• YTD: 26.34%
• 1Y: 53.55%
• 3Y*: 33.98%
• 5Y*: 20.22%
• 10Y*: 16.29%

ZUB.TO

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 5.68%
• 6M: 12.24%
• YTD: 13.16%
• 1Y: 27.16%
• 3Y*: 28.39%
• 5Y*: 8.08%
• 10Y*: 11.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXF.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HXF.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF	26.34%	35.34%	30.19%	12.46%	-9.00%	35.14%	1.80%	21.45%	-9.50%	12.67%
ZUB.TO BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF	13.16%	20.24%	33.07%	-6.02%	-23.00%	39.30%	-10.15%	33.34%	-19.80%	17.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HXF.TO and ZUB.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2013	0.34

The correlation between HXF.TO and ZUB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HXF.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HXF.TO	ZUB.TO
Financial Services	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HXF.TO vs. ZUB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXF.TO

HXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
HXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
HXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
HXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
HXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ZUB.TO

ZUB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 41
ZUB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
ZUB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ZUB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ZUB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
ZUB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXF.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) and BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HXF.TO	ZUB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.07	1.33	+2.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.74	1.87	+3.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.80	1.24	+0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.78	1.60	+5.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.43	4.33	+23.10

HXF.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.07, which is higher than the ZUB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXF.TO and ZUB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HXF.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, smaller than the maximum ZUB.TO drawdown of -55.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXF.TO and ZUB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HXF.TO	ZUB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.77%	-55.05%	+15.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.94%	-17.10%	+9.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.90%	-27.33%	+14.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.45%	-52.97%	+31.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.77%	-55.05%	+15.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.06%	-14.10%	+9.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	6.28%	-4.32%

Volatility

HXF.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) is 3.58%, while BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUB.TO) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that HXF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZUB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HXF.TO	ZUB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	4.43%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.62%	15.21%	-3.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.23%	20.67%	-7.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.79%	27.85%	-13.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.03%	30.14%	-13.11%

Dividends

HXF.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXF.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZUB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HXF.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZUB.TO BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF	1.73%	1.96%	2.29%	2.91%	2.50%	1.88%	2.57%	2.13%	1.92%	1.15%	1.34%	1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HXF.TO and ZUB.TO in my portfolio?

HXF.TO and ZUB.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between HXF.TO and ZUB.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO.