PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXF.TO achieves a 20.97% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 24.43% return. Over the past 10 years, HXF.TO has outperformed ENCC.TO with an annualized return of 16.04%, while ENCC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.31% annualized return.


HXF.TO

1D
0.49%
1M
7.63%
YTD
20.97%
6M
21.66%
1Y
52.43%
3Y*
34.42%
5Y*
19.35%
10Y*
16.04%

ENCC.TO

1D
0.64%
1M
-4.83%
YTD
24.43%
6M
25.49%
1Y
34.49%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
23.41%
10Y*
8.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXF.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF
20.97%35.34%30.19%12.46%-9.00%35.14%1.80%21.45%-9.50%12.67%
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF
24.43%13.13%17.39%5.72%41.32%80.54%-27.98%6.56%-30.99%-18.47%

Correlation

The correlation between HXF.TO and ENCC.TO is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2013

0.21

The correlation between HXF.TO and ENCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXF.TO
ENCC.TO

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

HXF.TO
100.0%
ENCC.TO

-

Basic Materials

HXF.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Communication Services

HXF.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

HXF.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HXF.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Energy

HXF.TO

-

ENCC.TO
100.0%

Healthcare

HXF.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Industrials

HXF.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Real Estate

HXF.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Technology

HXF.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Utilities

HXF.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXF.TO
HXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
HXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ENCC.TO
ENCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HXF.TOENCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

1.42

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.64

4.09

+2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.97

13.56

+13.41

HXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.08, which is higher than the ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXF.TO and ENCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -93.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXF.TO and ENCC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXF.TOENCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.77%

-93.29%

+53.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.94%

-8.48%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-16.67%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.45%

-25.58%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.77%

-82.15%

+42.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-28.36%

+28.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-55.98%

+50.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.56%

-0.61%

Volatility

HXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) is 3.60%, while Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that HXF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXF.TOENCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

5.30%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.27%

12.33%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

14.53%

-1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.74%

22.97%

-8.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

29.02%

-11.95%

HXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXF.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

HXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXF.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF
11.50%13.62%14.58%14.87%12.55%4.23%5.10%6.11%8.37%6.93%4.34%3.03%
HXF.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HXF.TO and ENCC.TO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXF.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXF.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ENCC.TO.

HXF.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while ENCC.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXF.TO and 0.76% for ENCC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXF.TO and ENCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer