PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXF.TO achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 23.22% return. Over the past 10 years, HXF.TO has underperformed CFOU.TO with an annualized return of 14.63%, while CFOU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.91% annualized return.


HXF.TO

1D
-1.17%
1M
3.65%
YTD
10.81%
6M
16.65%
1Y
40.51%
3Y*
29.70%
5Y*
17.03%
10Y*
14.63%

CFOU.TO

1D
-1.41%
1M
9.71%
YTD
23.22%
6M
34.47%
1Y
88.95%
3Y*
57.23%
5Y*
28.45%
10Y*
22.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXF.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF
10.81%35.34%30.20%12.45%-9.00%35.14%1.80%21.45%-9.50%12.67%
CFOU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF
23.22%69.17%56.15%18.37%-23.64%79.61%-14.70%40.45%-21.67%22.44%

Correlation

The correlation between HXF.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013

0.45

The correlation between HXF.TO and CFOU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXF.TO
CFOU.TO

Financial Services

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

HXF.TO
100.0%
CFOU.TO
100.0%

Basic Materials

HXF.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Communication Services

HXF.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

HXF.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HXF.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Energy

HXF.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Healthcare

HXF.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Industrials

HXF.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Real Estate

HXF.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Technology

HXF.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Utilities

HXF.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXF.TO
HXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CFOU.TO
CFOU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXF.TOCFOU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.57

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.14

5.56

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.92

22.74

-1.81

HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is comparable to the CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXF.TO and CFOU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXF.TOCFOU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

3.62

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.18

1.04

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.68

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.33

+0.48

Drawdowns

HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXF.TO and CFOU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXF.TOCFOU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.77%

-86.23%

+46.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.94%

-16.08%

+8.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-24.95%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.66%

-45.23%

+23.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.77%

-67.29%

+27.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-3.23%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-22.46%

+17.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

3.93%

-1.98%

Volatility

HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) is 3.84%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that HXF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXF.TOCFOU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

8.18%

-4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

20.93%

-9.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.65%

24.70%

-12.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.46%

27.56%

-13.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

33.85%

-16.91%

HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXF.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOU.TO's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HXF.TO nor CFOU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HXF.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXF.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXF.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.

HXF.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while CFOU.TO is Leveraged Equities. HXF.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index (Total Return), while CFOU.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXF.TO and 1.52% for CFOU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXF.TO and CFOU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer