HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO
HXF.TO (Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF) and CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXF.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index (Total Return), while CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HXF.TO returned 14.63%/yr vs 22.91%/yr for CFOU.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HXF.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CFOU.TO.
Performance
HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXF.TO achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 23.22% return. Over the past 10 years, HXF.TO has underperformed CFOU.TO with an annualized return of 14.63%, while CFOU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.91% annualized return.
HXF.TO
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 40.51%
- 3Y*
- 29.70%
- 5Y*
- 17.03%
- 10Y*
- 14.63%
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 9.71%
- YTD
- 23.22%
- 6M
- 34.47%
- 1Y
- 88.95%
- 3Y*
- 57.23%
- 5Y*
- 28.45%
- 10Y*
- 22.91%
HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXF.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF | 10.81% | 35.34% | 30.20% | 12.45% | -9.00% | 35.14% | 1.80% | 21.45% | -9.50% | 12.67% |
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 23.22% | 69.17% | 56.15% | 18.37% | -23.64% | 79.61% | -14.70% | 40.45% | -21.67% | 22.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXF.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013 | 0.45 |
The correlation between HXF.TO and CFOU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXF.TO
CFOU.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
HXF.TO
CFOU.TO
Basic Materials
HXF.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Communication Services
HXF.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HXF.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HXF.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Energy
HXF.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Healthcare
HXF.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Industrials
HXF.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Real Estate
HXF.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Technology
HXF.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Utilities
HXF.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXF.TO
CFOU.TO
HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXF.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.57 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.14 | 5.56 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.92 | 22.74 | -1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXF.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23 | 3.62 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.18 | 1.04 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.68 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.33 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXF.TO and CFOU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXF.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.77% | -86.23% | +46.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.94% | -16.08% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.90% | -24.95% | +12.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.66% | -45.23% | +23.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.77% | -67.29% | +27.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -3.23% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -22.46% | +17.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 3.93% | -1.98% |
Volatility
HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) is 3.84%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that HXF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXF.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 8.18% | -4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 20.93% | -9.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.65% | 24.70% | -12.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 27.56% | -13.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 33.85% | -16.91% |
HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXF.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOU.TO's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
HXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HXF.TO nor CFOU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HXF.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXF.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXF.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
HXF.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while CFOU.TO is Leveraged Equities. HXF.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index (Total Return), while CFOU.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXF.TO and 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXF.TO and CFOU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer