HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO
HXEM.TO (Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF) and ZSP.TO (BMO S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXEM.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Global X Emerging Markets Futures Roll Index (Total Return), while ZSP.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXEM.TO returned 8.42%/yr vs 15.39%/yr for ZSP.TO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HXEM.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZSP.TO.
Performance
HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXEM.TO achieves a 23.28% return, which is significantly higher than ZSP.TO's 13.48% return.
HXEM.TO
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- 6M
- 16.11%
- YTD
- 23.28%
- 1Y
- 41.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- —
ZSP.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 10.32%
- YTD
- 13.48%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 22.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.81%
HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXEM.TO Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF | 23.28% | 26.46% | 14.53% | 7.09% | -16.39% | -2.71% | 12.67% |
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 13.48% | 12.36% | 35.07% | 23.30% | -12.68% | 27.54% | 7.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXEM.TO and ZSP.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020 | 0.49 |
The correlation between HXEM.TO and ZSP.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXEM.TO
ZSP.TO
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
HXEM.TO
ZSP.TO
Basic Materials
HXEM.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Communication Services
HXEM.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HXEM.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Consumer Defensive
HXEM.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Energy
HXEM.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Financial Services
HXEM.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Healthcare
HXEM.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Industrials
HXEM.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Technology
HXEM.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Utilities
HXEM.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXEM.TO
ZSP.TO
HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HXEM.TO | ZSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 2.89 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.71 | 10.69 | +0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, which is greater than ZSP.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXEM.TO and ZSP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXEM.TO | ZSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.00% | -26.94% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.34% | -8.61% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.40% | -18.95% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -22.25% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.26% | -0.98% | -7.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.56% | -3.32% | -10.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 2.32% | +1.52% |
Volatility
HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) at 3.63%. This indicates that HXEM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXEM.TO | ZSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.40% | 3.63% | +7.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.61% | 9.61% | +12.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.56% | 12.21% | +11.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 15.09% | +2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 16.39% | +1.35% |
HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXEM.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSP.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Dividend Comparison
HXEM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZSP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXEM.TO Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.76% | 0.82% | 0.94% | 1.33% | 1.44% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.68% | 1.68% | 2.23% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HXEM.TO and ZSP.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXEM.TO.
HXEM.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ZSP.TO is S&P 500. HXEM.TO tracks Global X Emerging Markets Futures Roll Index (Total Return), while ZSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXEM.TO and 0.09% for ZSP.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXEM.TO and ZSP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer