PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXEM.TO achieves a 23.28% return, which is significantly higher than ZSP.TO's 13.48% return.


HXEM.TO

1D
1.21%
1M
-2.14%
6M
16.11%
YTD
23.28%
1Y
41.02%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*

ZSP.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.23%
6M
10.32%
YTD
13.48%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
22.55%
5Y*
15.39%
10Y*
15.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HXEM.TO
Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF
23.28%26.46%14.53%7.09%-16.39%-2.71%12.67%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
13.48%12.36%35.07%23.30%-12.68%27.54%7.85%

Correlation

The correlation between HXEM.TO and ZSP.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020

0.49

The correlation between HXEM.TO and ZSP.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXEM.TO
ZSP.TO

Real Estate

16.6%
1.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.0%

Financial Services

-

11.5%

Healthcare

-

8.9%

Industrials

-

8.1%

Technology

-

38.7%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Real Estate

HXEM.TO
16.6%
ZSP.TO
1.8%

Basic Materials

HXEM.TO

-

ZSP.TO
1.7%

Communication Services

HXEM.TO

-

ZSP.TO
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HXEM.TO

-

ZSP.TO
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

HXEM.TO

-

ZSP.TO
4.5%

Energy

HXEM.TO

-

ZSP.TO
3.0%

Financial Services

HXEM.TO

-

ZSP.TO
11.5%

Healthcare

HXEM.TO

-

ZSP.TO
8.9%

Industrials

HXEM.TO

-

ZSP.TO
8.1%

Technology

HXEM.TO

-

ZSP.TO
38.7%

Utilities

HXEM.TO

-

ZSP.TO
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXEM.TO
HXEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HXEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
HXEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ZSP.TO
ZSP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HXEM.TOZSP.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.89

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.71

10.69

+0.02

HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXEM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXEM.TO and ZSP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, which is greater than ZSP.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXEM.TO and ZSP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXEM.TOZSP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-26.94%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-8.61%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.40%

-18.95%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-22.25%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.26%

-0.98%

-7.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-3.32%

-10.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

2.32%

+1.52%

Volatility

HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) at 3.63%. This indicates that HXEM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXEM.TOZSP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.40%

3.63%

+7.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.61%

9.61%

+12.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.56%

12.21%

+11.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

15.09%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.74%

16.39%

+1.35%

HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXEM.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSP.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HXEM.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXEM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZSP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HXEM.TO
Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
0.76%0.82%0.94%1.33%1.44%1.15%1.45%1.48%1.68%1.68%2.23%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


HXEM.TO and ZSP.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXEM.TO.

HXEM.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ZSP.TO is S&P 500. HXEM.TO tracks Global X Emerging Markets Futures Roll Index (Total Return), while ZSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXEM.TO and 0.09% for ZSP.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXEM.TO and ZSP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer