HXEM.TO vs. HBB.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HXEM.TO (Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF) and HBB.TO (Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXEM.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Global X Emerging Markets Futures Roll Index (Total Return), while HBB.TO is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Select Universe Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXEM.TO returned 9.75%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for HBB.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HXEM.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for HBB.TO.

Performance

HXEM.TO vs. HBB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) and Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXEM.TO achieves a 28.95% return, which is significantly higher than HBB.TO's 1.48% return.

HXEM.TO

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 11.29%
• YTD: 28.95%
• 6M: 29.50%
• 1Y: 56.68%
• 3Y*: 24.44%
• 5Y*: 9.75%
• 10Y*: —

HBB.TO

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 0.58%
• 1Y: 2.70%
• 3Y*: 3.63%
• 5Y*: 0.33%
• 10Y*: 1.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXEM.TO vs. HBB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HXEM.TO Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF	28.95%	26.46%	14.53%	7.09%	-16.39%	-2.71%	12.33%
HBB.TO Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF	1.48%	1.84%	3.96%	5.76%	-11.94%	-2.35%	-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between HXEM.TO and HBB.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020	0.09

The correlation between HXEM.TO and HBB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (5 years) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HXEM.TO vs. HBB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HXEM.TO	HBB.TO
Real Estate	16.6%	9.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HXEM.TO vs. HBB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXEM.TO

HXEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
HXEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
HXEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
HXEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
HXEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
HXEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

HBB.TO

HBB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 19
HBB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
HBB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HBB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 18
HBB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
HBB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXEM.TO vs. HBB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) and Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HXEM.TO	HBB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	0.61	+2.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	0.84	+2.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.11	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.61	0.97	+3.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.65	2.20	+14.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HXEM.TO vs. HBB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXEM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the HBB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXEM.TO and HBB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HXEM.TO	HBB.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91	0.61	+2.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.05	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.30	+0.35

Drawdowns

HXEM.TO vs. HBB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, which is greater than HBB.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXEM.TO and HBB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HXEM.TO	HBB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.00%	-18.23%	-16.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.34%	-2.78%	-9.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.40%	-5.56%	-9.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.44%	-16.19%	-14.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-2.97%	+2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.75%	-4.58%	-9.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	1.23%	+2.18%

Volatility

HXEM.TO vs. HBB.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.38% compared to Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) at 1.58%. This indicates that HXEM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HXEM.TO	HBB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.38%	1.58%	+6.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.05%	3.43%	+13.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.60%	4.44%	+15.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.03%	6.54%	+10.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	7.09%	+9.86%

HXEM.TO vs. HBB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXEM.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HBB.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HXEM.TO vs. HBB.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HXEM.TO nor HBB.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HXEM.TO and HBB.TO in my portfolio?

HXEM.TO and HBB.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HXEM.TO or HBB.TO?

On fees, HBB.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HXEM.TO or HBB.TO?

HBB.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXEM.TO.

What is the main difference between HXEM.TO and HBB.TO?

HXEM.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while HBB.TO is Total Bond Market. HXEM.TO tracks Global X Emerging Markets Futures Roll Index (Total Return), while HBB.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Select Universe Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXEM.TO and 0.09% for HBB.TO.