HXE.TO vs. ZMT.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO).

HXE.TO and ZMT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HXE.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index (Total Return). It was launched on Sep 16, 2013. ZMT.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive Equal Weight Global Base Metals Index Canadian Dollar Hedged. It was launched on Oct 20, 2009. Both HXE.TO and ZMT.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HXE.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HXE.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HXE.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF	41.53%	17.30%	14.39%	3.95%	53.52%	81.48%	-33.82%	10.05%	-26.98%	-12.23%
ZMT.TO BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)	9.48%	63.17%	15.30%	14.54%	-6.65%	11.04%	14.70%	15.82%	-34.17%	37.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXE.TO achieves a 41.53% return, which is significantly higher than ZMT.TO's 9.48% return. Over the past 10 years, HXE.TO has underperformed ZMT.TO with an annualized return of 13.21%, while ZMT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.66% annualized return.

HXE.TO

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 15.83%
• YTD: 41.53%
• 6M: 49.74%
• 1Y: 59.53%
• 3Y*: 27.25%
• 5Y*: 33.29%
• 10Y*: 13.21%

ZMT.TO

• 1D: 7.64%
• 1M: -13.72%
• YTD: 9.48%
• 6M: 27.57%
• 1Y: 85.63%
• 3Y*: 28.28%
• 5Y*: 16.96%
• 10Y*: 15.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXE.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXE.TO has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMT.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.

ZMT.TO

BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)

HXE.TO

Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF

Return for Risk

HXE.TO vs. ZMT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXE.TO

HXE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
HXE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
HXE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
HXE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
HXE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 88

ZMT.TO

ZMT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
ZMT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ZMT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ZMT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ZMT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ZMT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXE.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HXE.TO	ZMT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	2.12	+0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.66	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.38	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	3.58	-0.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.74	11.07	-0.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HXE.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the ZMT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXE.TO and ZMT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HXE.TO	ZMT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	2.12	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.15	0.51	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.47	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.00	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between HXE.TO and ZMT.TO is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HXE.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZMT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HXE.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZMT.TO BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)	0.19%	0.21%	0.34%	0.87%	1.46%	2.82%	1.03%	2.34%	3.95%	1.29%	1.24%	1.10%

Drawdowns

HXE.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXE.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.92%, which is greater than ZMT.TO's maximum drawdown of -80.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXE.TO and ZMT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HXE.TO	ZMT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.92%	-80.73%	-5.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.40%	-23.81%	+3.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.83%	-41.01%	+12.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.40%	-67.51%	-12.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-14.38%	+13.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.18%	-43.56%	+12.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.76%	7.70%	-1.94%

Volatility

HXE.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) is 6.15%, while BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO) has a volatility of 17.21%. This indicates that HXE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZMT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HXE.TO	ZMT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	17.21%	-11.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.56%	32.63%	-18.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.03%	40.64%	-13.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.04%	33.30%	-4.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.64%	33.22%	+0.42%