PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXE.TO vs. EMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HXE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HXE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HXE.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF
41.53%17.30%17.85%
EMAX.TO
Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
31.32%4.63%3.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXE.TO achieves a 41.53% return, which is significantly higher than EMAX.TO's 31.32% return.


HXE.TO

1D
-0.76%
1M
15.83%
YTD
41.53%
6M
49.74%
1Y
59.53%
3Y*
27.25%
5Y*
33.29%
10Y*
13.21%

EMAX.TO

1D
-1.98%
1M
11.00%
YTD
31.32%
6M
31.82%
1Y
30.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HXE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXE.TO has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than EMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HXE.TO vs. EMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXE.TO
HXE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

EMAX.TO
EMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXE.TOEMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.22

1.16

+1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

1.55

+1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

1.54

+1.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.74

4.01

+6.73

HXE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXE.TO and EMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXE.TOEMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.16

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.81

-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between HXE.TO and EMAX.TO is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HXE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%.


Drawdowns

HXE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXE.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.92%, which is greater than EMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXE.TO and EMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HXE.TOEMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.92%

-27.55%

-58.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.40%

-20.97%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-3.30%

+2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.18%

-9.52%

-21.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

8.03%

-2.27%

Volatility

HXE.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) at 5.45%. This indicates that HXE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HXE.TOEMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.15%

5.45%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.56%

13.03%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.03%

26.34%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.04%

22.14%

+6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.64%

22.14%

+11.50%