HWWA.L vs. ZPDH.DE
HWWA.L (HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF) and ZPDH.DE (SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HWWA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ZPDH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P Health Care Select Sector. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HWWA.L returned 13.22%/yr vs 9.98%/yr for ZPDH.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HWWA.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ZPDH.DE.
Performance
HWWA.L vs. ZPDH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HWWA.L is traded in GBP, while ZPDH.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ZPDH.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWWA.L achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly higher than ZPDH.DE's -1.90% return. Over the past 10 years, HWWA.L has outperformed ZPDH.DE with an annualized return of 13.22%, while ZPDH.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.98% annualized return.
HWWA.L
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 6M
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 34.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.22%
ZPDH.DE
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- -1.90%
- 6M
- -1.17%
- 1Y
- 16.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.98%
HWWA.L vs. ZPDH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 13.69% | 16.74% | 17.83% | 15.71% | -7.83% | 21.70% | 11.03% | 18.57% | -5.55% | 12.89% |
ZPDH.DE SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF | -1.90% | 7.02% | 3.73% | -3.70% | 8.97% | 28.05% | 7.43% | 17.90% | 10.61% | 11.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWWA.L and ZPDH.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HWWA.L and ZPDH.DE has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HWWA.L vs. ZPDH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
HWWA.L
ZPDH.DE
HWWA.L vs. ZPDH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWWA.L | ZPDH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.19 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | 1.37 | +3.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.35 | 3.42 | +17.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWWA.L | ZPDH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34 | 1.09 | +2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.47 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 0.62 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.56 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
HWWA.L vs. ZPDH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWWA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.12%, which is greater than ZPDH.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWWA.L and ZPDH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWWA.L | ZPDH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.12% | -19.43% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.74% | -11.67% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.79% | -19.43% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.79% | -19.43% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.12% | -19.43% | -5.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -5.23% | +4.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -4.75% | +1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 4.69% | -3.09% |
Volatility
HWWA.L vs. ZPDH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) is 3.48%, while SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that HWWA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPDH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HWWA.L | ZPDH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 5.41% | -1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.85% | 10.45% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.23% | 14.66% | -4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 14.53% | -1.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 16.09% | -1.77% |
HWWA.L vs. ZPDH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWWA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDH.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HWWA.L vs. ZPDH.DE - Dividend Comparison
HWWA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while ZPDH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 1.29% | 1.43% | 1.58% | 1.95% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 2.07% | 2.10% | 1.86% | 1.71% | 1.97% |
ZPDH.DE SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HWWA.L and ZPDH.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZPDH.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPDH.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HWWA.L.
HWWA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ZPDH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. HWWA.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ZPDH.DE tracks S&P Health Care Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HWWA.L and 0.15% for ZPDH.DE.
Find the right allocation for HWWA.L and ZPDH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer