PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HWWA.L vs. XDEB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HWWA.L vs. XDEB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HWWA.L (HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF) and XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from HSBC and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HWWA.L returned 13.22%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for XDEB.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

HWWA.L vs. XDEB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HWWA.L is traded in GBP, while XDEB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEB.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWWA.L achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.L's 1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, HWWA.L has outperformed XDEB.L with an annualized return of 13.22%, while XDEB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.

HWWA.L

1D
-0.33%
1M
5.53%
YTD
13.69%
6M
14.69%
1Y
34.30%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
13.22%

XDEB.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.82%
YTD
1.04%
6M
0.90%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWWA.L vs. XDEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF		13.69%16.74%17.83%15.71%-7.83%21.70%11.03%18.57%-5.55%12.89%
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C		1.04%3.40%13.01%1.49%1.23%16.00%-0.96%18.55%3.44%7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between HWWA.L and XDEB.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between HWWA.L and XDEB.L has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HWWA.L vs. XDEB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HWWA.L
XDEB.L

Technology

34.2%
20.1%

Financial Services

14.0%
14.0%

Industrials

13.2%
9.2%

Communication Services

8.4%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
5.6%

Basic Materials

5.8%
1.1%

Healthcare

5.6%
13.8%

Energy

4.2%
4.5%

Utilities

2.5%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
10.9%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.7%

Technology

HWWA.L
34.2%
XDEB.L
20.1%

Financial Services

HWWA.L
14.0%
XDEB.L
14.0%

Industrials

HWWA.L
13.2%
XDEB.L
9.2%

Communication Services

HWWA.L
8.4%
XDEB.L
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HWWA.L
8.3%
XDEB.L
5.6%

Basic Materials

HWWA.L
5.8%
XDEB.L
1.1%

Healthcare

HWWA.L
5.6%
XDEB.L
13.8%

Energy

HWWA.L
4.2%
XDEB.L
4.5%

Utilities

HWWA.L
2.5%
XDEB.L
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

HWWA.L
2.2%
XDEB.L
10.9%

Real Estate

HWWA.L
1.4%
XDEB.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF

Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C

Often compared with HWWA.L:
HWWA.L vs. GERD.DEHWWA.L vs. JMOMHWWA.L vs. JPGL.LHWWA.L vs. MFDXHWWA.L vs. HMWO.LHWWA.L vs. IWFQ.LHWWA.L vs. IWDA.L
Often compared with XDEB.L:
XDEB.L vs. MVUS.LXDEB.L vs. XDEM.LXDEB.L vs. SWDA.LXDEB.L vs. XDEQ.LXDEB.L vs. VWRA.LXDEB.L vs. VHYL.ASXDEB.L vs. AVGC.L

Return for Risk

HWWA.L vs. XDEB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HWWA.L
HWWA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
XDEB.L
XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWWA.L vs. XDEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HWWA.LXDEB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.34
0.33

+3.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.56
0.54

+4.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.06

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

0.41

+4.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.35

1.14

+20.21

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HWWA.L vs. XDEB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWWA.L and XDEB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HWWA.LXDEB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34

0.33

+3.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.66

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.69

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.78

+0.06

Drawdowns

HWWA.L vs. XDEB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWWA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.12%, which is greater than XDEB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWWA.L and XDEB.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HWWA.LXDEB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.12%

-19.61%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

-6.39%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.79%

-8.47%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.79%

-10.19%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.12%

-19.61%

-5.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-3.52%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-3.50%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

2.32%

-0.72%

Volatility

HWWA.L vs. XDEB.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) at 2.66%. This indicates that HWWA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HWWA.LXDEB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

2.66%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

5.97%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.23%

7.97%

+2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.69%

9.68%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.32%

11.52%

+2.80%

HWWA.L vs. XDEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HWWA.L and XDEB.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HWWA.L vs. XDEB.L - Dividend Comparison

HWWA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while XDEB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF		1.29%1.43%1.58%1.95%2.07%1.48%1.45%2.07%2.10%1.86%1.71%1.97%
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

HWWA.L and XDEB.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HWWA.L and XDEB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and DWS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWWA.L and XDEB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer