HWWA.L vs. HMUD.L
HWWA.L (HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF) and HMUD.L (HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HWWA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while HMUD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HWWA.L returned 13.41%/yr vs 15.50%/yr for HMUD.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HWWA.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for HMUD.L.
Performance
HWWA.L vs. HMUD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HWWA.L is traded in GBP, while HMUD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HMUD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWWA.L achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than HMUD.L's 8.49% return. Over the past 10 years, HWWA.L has underperformed HMUD.L with an annualized return of 13.41%, while HMUD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.50% annualized return.
HWWA.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 34.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
HMUD.L
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 8.49%
- 6M
- 8.47%
- 1Y
- 22.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
HWWA.L vs. HMUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 14.08% | 16.74% | 17.83% | 15.71% | -7.83% | 21.70% | 11.03% | 18.57% | -5.55% | 12.89% |
HMUD.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 8.49% | 5.78% | 27.24% | 21.09% | -10.74% | 28.57% | 17.17% | 25.51% | -0.13% | 11.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWWA.L and HMUD.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014 | 0.86 |
The correlation between HWWA.L and HMUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HWWA.L vs. HMUD.L — Risk / Return Rank
HWWA.L
HMUD.L
HWWA.L vs. HMUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWWA.L | HMUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.37 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.16 | 3.35 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.78 | 11.84 | +9.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWWA.L | HMUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.41 | 2.01 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.86 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.95 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
HWWA.L vs. HMUD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWWA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.12%, roughly equal to the maximum HMUD.L drawdown of -26.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWWA.L and HMUD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWWA.L | HMUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.12% | -26.43% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.74% | -6.80% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.79% | -21.51% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.79% | -21.51% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.12% | -26.43% | +1.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.01% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -3.54% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.93% | -0.33% |
Volatility
HWWA.L vs. HMUD.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) have volatilities of 3.43% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HWWA.L | HMUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 3.35% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | 8.29% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.26% | 11.38% | -1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 15.54% | -2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 16.58% | -2.25% |
HWWA.L vs. HMUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWWA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HMUD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
HWWA.L vs. HMUD.L - Dividend Comparison
HWWA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than HMUD.L's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMUD.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 0.92% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 1.22% | 1.45% | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.43% |
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 1.29% | 1.43% | 1.58% | 1.95% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 2.07% | 2.10% | 1.86% | 1.71% | 1.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HWWA.L and HMUD.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HWWA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HWWA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HMUD.L.
HWWA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while HMUD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. HWWA.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while HMUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HWWA.L and 0.30% for HMUD.L.
Find the right allocation for HWWA.L and HMUD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer