PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWWA.L vs. H412.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWWA.L vs. H412.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (H412.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HWWA.L is traded in GBP, while H412.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the H412.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWWA.L achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly lower than H412.DE's 14.42% return.


HWWA.L

1D
-0.33%
1M
5.53%
YTD
13.69%
6M
14.69%
1Y
34.30%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
13.22%

H412.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
8.66%
YTD
14.42%
6M
15.53%
1Y
36.27%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWWA.L vs. H412.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF
13.69%16.74%17.83%15.71%-7.83%21.70%9.17%
H412.DE
HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
14.42%11.64%21.21%15.26%-8.37%29.56%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between HWWA.L and H412.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2020

0.85

The correlation between HWWA.L and H412.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWWA.L vs. H412.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWWA.L
HWWA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

H412.DE
H412.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
H412.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H412.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
H412.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
H412.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
H412.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWWA.L vs. H412.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (H412.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HWWA.LH412.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.62

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

6.59

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.35

23.09

-1.73

HWWA.L vs. H412.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is comparable to the H412.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWWA.L and H412.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HWWA.LH412.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34

3.34

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.98

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.02

-0.19

Drawdowns

HWWA.L vs. H412.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWWA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.12%, which is greater than H412.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWWA.L and H412.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWWA.LH412.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.12%

-22.06%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

-5.48%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.79%

-22.06%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.79%

-22.06%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

0.00%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-3.22%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.57%

+0.03%

Volatility

HWWA.L vs. H412.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (H412.DE) have volatilities of 3.48% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWWA.LH412.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.58%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

7.72%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.23%

10.83%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.69%

14.27%

-1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.32%

14.48%

-0.16%

HWWA.L vs. H412.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWWA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than H412.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HWWA.L vs. H412.DE - Dividend Comparison

HWWA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while H412.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H412.DE
HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF
1.29%1.43%1.58%1.95%2.07%1.48%1.45%2.07%2.10%1.86%1.71%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWWA.L and H412.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H412.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H412.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HWWA.L.

HWWA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while H412.DE is Large Cap Blend Equities. HWWA.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while H412.DE tracks FTSE USA ESG Low Carbon Select. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HWWA.L and 0.12% for H412.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWWA.L and H412.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer