PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HWWA.L vs. BATG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HWWA.L vs. BATG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HWWA.L (HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF) and BATG.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HWWA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while BATG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HWWA.L returned 13.07%/yr vs 17.96%/yr for BATG.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HWWA.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BATG.L.

Performance

HWWA.L vs. BATG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HWWA.L is traded in GBP, while BATG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BATG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWWA.L achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly lower than BATG.L's 37.63% return.

HWWA.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
6.39%
YTD
14.08%
6M
15.66%
1Y
34.98%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
13.41%

BATG.L

1D
-1.34%
1M
2.71%
YTD
37.63%
6M
44.30%
1Y
135.61%
3Y*
26.06%
5Y*
17.96%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWWA.L vs. BATG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF		14.08%16.74%17.83%15.71%-7.83%21.70%11.03%18.57%-7.80%
BATG.L
L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF		37.63%60.42%0.47%2.83%-3.91%17.00%75.38%12.95%-17.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HWWA.L and BATG.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2018

0.74

The correlation between HWWA.L and BATG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

HWWA.L vs. BATG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HWWA.L
BATG.L

Technology

34.2%
17.6%

Financial Services

14.0%

-

Industrials

13.2%
31.2%

Communication Services

8.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
20.1%

Basic Materials

5.8%
24.4%

Healthcare

5.6%

-

Energy

4.2%

-

Utilities

2.5%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Technology

HWWA.L
34.2%
BATG.L
17.6%

Financial Services

HWWA.L
14.0%
BATG.L

-

Industrials

HWWA.L
13.2%
BATG.L
31.2%

Communication Services

HWWA.L
8.4%
BATG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

HWWA.L
8.3%
BATG.L
20.1%

Basic Materials

HWWA.L
5.8%
BATG.L
24.4%

Healthcare

HWWA.L
5.6%
BATG.L

-

Energy

HWWA.L
4.2%
BATG.L

-

Utilities

HWWA.L
2.5%
BATG.L
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

HWWA.L
2.2%
BATG.L

-

Real Estate

HWWA.L
1.4%
BATG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF

L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF

Often compared with HWWA.L:
HWWA.L vs. GERD.DEHWWA.L vs. JMOMHWWA.L vs. JPGL.LHWWA.L vs. MFDXHWWA.L vs. HMWO.LHWWA.L vs. IWFQ.LHWWA.L vs. IWDA.L
Often compared with BATG.L:
BATG.L vs. DPGT.LBATG.L vs. HIWO.LBATG.L vs. CHRG.LBATG.L vs. WMVG.LBATG.L vs. HTWG.LBATG.L vs. HBGD.TOBATG.L vs. XMWD.L

Return for Risk

HWWA.L vs. BATG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HWWA.L
HWWA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
BATG.L
BATG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BATG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BATG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWWA.L vs. BATG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HWWA.LBATG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.41
4.86

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.64
5.16

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.70

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.16

9.91

-4.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.78

34.05

-12.27

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HWWA.L vs. BATG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is comparable to the BATG.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWWA.L and BATG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HWWA.LBATG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

4.86

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.80

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.82

+0.02

Drawdowns

HWWA.L vs. BATG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWWA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.12%, smaller than the maximum BATG.L drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWWA.L and BATG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HWWA.LBATG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.12%

-33.37%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

-13.61%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.79%

-33.37%

+16.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.79%

-33.37%

+16.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.12%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-1.75%

+1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-8.99%

+5.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

3.97%

-2.37%

Volatility

HWWA.L vs. BATG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) is 3.43%, while L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L) has a volatility of 9.84%. This indicates that HWWA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HWWA.LBATG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

9.84%

-6.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

21.92%

-14.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.26%

27.78%

-17.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.69%

22.51%

-9.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

22.84%

-8.51%

HWWA.L vs. BATG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWWA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BATG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

HWWA.L vs. BATG.L - Dividend Comparison

HWWA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while BATG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATG.L
L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF		1.29%1.43%1.58%1.95%2.07%1.48%1.45%2.07%2.10%1.86%1.71%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

HWWA.L and BATG.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HWWA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HWWA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATG.L.

HWWA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BATG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. HWWA.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while BATG.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Legal & General Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HWWA.L and 0.49% for BATG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWWA.L and BATG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer