PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWVIX vs. VRTVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWVIX vs. VRTVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Diversified Value Fund (HWVIX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWVIX achieves a 15.13% return, which is significantly lower than VRTVX's 18.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HWVIX having a 10.75% annualized return and VRTVX not far behind at 10.48%.


HWVIX

1D
0.70%
1M
2.26%
YTD
15.13%
6M
14.07%
1Y
29.30%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
10.75%

VRTVX

1D
0.95%
1M
4.04%
YTD
18.94%
6M
18.07%
1Y
43.21%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
10.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWVIX vs. VRTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWVIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Diversified Value Fund
15.13%3.02%4.31%16.36%-6.33%35.19%1.25%21.68%-14.44%13.55%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
18.94%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between HWVIX and VRTVX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2014

0.96

The correlation between HWVIX and VRTVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWVIX vs. VRTVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWVIX
HWVIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
HWVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
HWVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWVIX vs. VRTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Diversified Value Fund (HWVIX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HWVIXVRTVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

5.34

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

18.14

-7.92

HWVIX vs. VRTVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWVIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the VRTVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWVIX and VRTVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HWVIXVRTVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.54

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.32

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.44

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.48

-0.11

Drawdowns

HWVIX vs. VRTVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWVIX drawdown since its inception was -52.18%, which is greater than VRTVX's maximum drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWVIX and VRTVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWVIXVRTVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.18%

-45.98%

-6.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-8.54%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.34%

-26.85%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

-26.85%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.18%

-45.98%

-6.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-7.78%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.51%

+0.64%

Volatility

HWVIX vs. VRTVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Diversified Value Fund (HWVIX) is 3.68%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that HWVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWVIXVRTVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

4.90%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

11.98%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.55%

17.95%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.64%

21.67%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.45%

23.71%

+0.74%

HWVIX vs. VRTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWVIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWVIX vs. VRTVX - Dividend Comparison

HWVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than VRTVX's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWVIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Diversified Value Fund
0.99%1.14%6.28%8.52%9.38%6.40%0.96%0.87%10.51%15.74%0.78%3.34%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.58%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, HWVIX and VRTVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VRTVX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to HWVIX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWVIX dropped -52.18% vs VRTVX's -45.98%.

VRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWVIX and VRTVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer