PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWSM vs. PEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWSM vs. PEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value ETF (HWSM) and Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWSM achieves a 15.69% return, which is significantly lower than PEY's 21.78% return.


HWSM

1D
-0.47%
1M
2.00%
6M
11.35%
YTD
15.69%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.20%

PEY

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.19%
6M
14.34%
YTD
21.78%
1Y
24.40%
3Y*
11.82%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
9.05%
ALL TIME*
6.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$461.44$384.46$2.38K
$6.16M$4.94M$4.80M

HWSM vs. PEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HWSM and PEY is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2025

0.85

The correlation between HWSM and PEY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWSM vs. PEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HWSM
HWSM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HWSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWSM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HWSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWSM Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PEY
PEY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEY Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEY Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HWSM vs. PEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value ETF (HWSM) and Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HWSMPEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.62

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

7.66

+0.77

HWSM vs. PEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the PEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWSM and PEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HWSM vs. PEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWSM drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum PEY drawdown of -72.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWSM and PEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWSMPEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-72.81%

+57.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-8.88%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-2.76%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-12.79%

+10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.03%

-0.06%

Volatility

HWSM vs. PEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value ETF (HWSM) is 3.56%, while Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that HWSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWSMPEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

5.27%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

10.05%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.08%

14.27%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.74%

16.45%

+3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.74%

18.91%

+0.83%

HWSM vs. PEY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWSM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PEY's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWSM vs. PEY - Dividend Comparison

HWSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than PEY's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWSM
Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value ETF
1.15%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PEY
Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF
4.26%4.85%4.44%4.58%4.22%3.83%4.30%3.78%4.33%3.21%3.12%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWSM and PEY have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEY has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to HWSM (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWSM dropped -15.67% vs PEY's -72.81%.

On 1-year performance, HWSM leads with 27.36% vs 24.40% for PEY. On fees, PEY is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, HWSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HWSM has performed better with a 27.36% return vs 24.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEY is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HWSM.

PEY has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 1.15% for HWSM.

They also come from different issuers: Hotchkis & Wiley and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for HWSM and 0.54% for PEY.

HWSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWSM and PEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer