PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWSM vs. AVMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWSM vs. AVMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value ETF (HWSM) and Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWSM achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly lower than AVMV's 12.62% return.


HWSM

1D
1.25%
1M
4.08%
YTD
10.77%
6M
12.03%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVMV

1D
0.77%
1M
1.60%
YTD
12.62%
6M
13.21%
1Y
27.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWSM vs. AVMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HWSM and AVMV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025

0.94

The correlation between HWSM and AVMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWSM vs. AVMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWSM
HWSM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HWSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HWSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWSM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

AVMV
AVMV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AVMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWSM vs. AVMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value ETF (HWSM) and Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HWSMAVMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

3.56

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

11.71

-3.10

HWSM vs. AVMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the AVMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWSM and AVMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HWSMAVMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.96

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

1.29

-0.33

Drawdowns

HWSM vs. AVMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWSM drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum AVMV drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWSM and AVMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWSMAVMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-24.24%

+8.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-7.63%

-2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-3.89%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.31%

+0.74%

Volatility

HWSM vs. AVMV - Volatility Comparison

Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value ETF (HWSM) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV) at 3.04%. This indicates that HWSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWSMAVMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.04%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

9.49%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

13.84%

+1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.58%

17.96%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

17.96%

+2.62%

HWSM vs. AVMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWSM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AVMV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWSM vs. AVMV - Dividend Comparison

HWSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than AVMV's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVMV
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF
1.01%1.20%1.30%0.25%
HWSM
Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value ETF
1.20%1.33%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, HWSM and AVMV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HWSM has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to AVMV (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWSM dropped -15.67% vs AVMV's -24.24%.

On 1-year performance, AVMV leads with 27.02% vs 26.16% for HWSM. On fees, AVMV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, AVMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVMV has performed better with a 27.02% return vs 26.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVMV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HWSM.

HWSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 1.01% for AVMV.

They also come from different issuers: Hotchkis & Wiley and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for HWSM and 0.20% for AVMV.

AVMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWSM and AVMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer