HWSIX vs. RYMMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund (RYMMX).
HWSIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Sep 20, 1985. RYMMX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Feb 20, 2004.
Performance
HWSIX vs. RYMMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWSIX vs. RYMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 7.19% | 1.60% | 5.00% | 18.85% | 2.97% | 35.54% | -0.31% | 20.54% | -15.03% | 7.66% |
RYMMX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund | -0.28% | 5.11% | 3.49% | 26.78% | -6.06% | 30.05% | 5.74% | 20.83% | -19.66% | 12.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWSIX achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly higher than RYMMX's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, HWSIX has outperformed RYMMX with an annualized return of 10.01%, while RYMMX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.72% annualized return.
HWSIX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 5.71%
- 1Y
- 16.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
RYMMX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- 11.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWSIX vs. RYMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWSIX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than RYMMX's 2.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWSIX vs. RYMMX — Risk / Return Rank
HWSIX
RYMMX
HWSIX vs. RYMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund (RYMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWSIX | RYMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.50 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 0.89 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.12 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.60 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 1.90 | +1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWSIX | RYMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.50 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.30 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.35 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.25 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWSIX and RYMMX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWSIX vs. RYMMX - Dividend Comparison
HWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than RYMMX's 0.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 0.94% | 1.01% | 8.35% | 1.90% | 13.44% | 0.36% | 0.80% | 4.89% | 9.84% | 5.07% | 0.41% | 11.78% |
RYMMX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund | 0.18% | 0.18% | 8.21% | 0.48% | 17.90% | 6.82% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 3.84% | 1.94% | 0.22% | 0.30% |
Drawdowns
HWSIX vs. RYMMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWSIX drawdown since its inception was -72.00%, roughly equal to the maximum RYMMX drawdown of -73.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWSIX and RYMMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWSIX | RYMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.00% | -73.49% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -15.36% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.92% | -25.11% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.67% | -54.43% | +0.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -10.46% | +7.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -12.05% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 4.82% | -0.40% |
Volatility
HWSIX vs. RYMMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) is 4.15%, while Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund (RYMMX) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that HWSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYMMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWSIX | RYMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 4.77% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 13.05% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.97% | 24.00% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 22.08% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 25.07% | -0.40% |