PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWM vs. FFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HWM vs. FFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWM achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly lower than FFIV's 55.21% return. Over the past 10 years, HWM has outperformed FFIV with an annualized return of 31.79%, while FFIV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.74% annualized return.


HWM

1D
-2.12%
1M
-8.87%
YTD
20.38%
6M
27.45%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
75.58%
5Y*
48.17%
10Y*
31.79%

FFIV

1D
0.72%
1M
11.91%
YTD
55.21%
6M
59.62%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
39.23%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWM vs. FFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
20.38%87.95%102.71%37.84%24.16%11.67%21.03%83.54%-37.43%48.40%
FFIV
F5 Networks, Inc.
55.21%1.51%40.50%24.72%-41.36%39.09%25.99%-13.81%23.48%-9.33%

Correlation

The correlation between HWM and FFIV is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 1999

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between HWM and FFIV has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HWM:

$99.36B

FFIV:

$22.70B

EPS

HWM:

$4.31

FFIV:

$12.19

PE Ratio

HWM:

57.22

FFIV:

32.50

PEG Ratio

HWM:

0.97

FFIV:

1.42

PS Ratio

HWM:

11.57

FFIV:

9.54

PB Ratio

HWM:

17.99

FFIV:

6.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

HWM:

$8.62B

FFIV:

$2.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HWM:

$2.81B

FFIV:

$2.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

HWM:

$2.66B

FFIV:

$889.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWM vs. FFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWM
HWM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
HWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FFIV
FFIV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWM vs. FFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HWMFFIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

0.99

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

2.17

+5.20

HWM vs. FFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the FFIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWM and FFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HWMFFIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.02

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.51

0.54

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.43

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.27

-0.06

Drawdowns

HWM vs. FFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWM drawdown since its inception was -88.30%, smaller than the maximum FFIV drawdown of -97.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWM and FFIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWMFFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.30%

-97.59%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.89%

-34.73%

+18.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-34.73%

+15.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.40%

-47.42%

+25.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.81%

-54.59%

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.88%

-3.16%

-6.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.01%

-40.19%

+9.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.58%

15.76%

-10.18%

Volatility

HWM vs. FFIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) is 7.62%, while F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that HWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWMFFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

9.07%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.08%

24.96%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.70%

33.52%

-2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.04%

30.02%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.78%

29.57%

+10.21%

Dividends

HWM vs. FFIV - Dividend Comparison

HWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, while FFIV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFIV
F5 Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
0.19%0.21%0.24%0.31%0.25%0.13%0.05%0.39%1.42%0.88%40.49%1.22%

Financials

HWM vs. FFIV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and F5 Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
2.31B
0
(HWM) Total Revenue
(FFIV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HWM and FFIV have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFIV has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to HWM (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWM dropped -88.30% vs FFIV's -97.59%.

HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWM and FFIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer