HWHIX vs. CCLFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley High Yield Fund (HWHIX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX).
HWHIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Mar 31, 2009. CCLFX is managed by Cliffwater. It was launched on Mar 6, 2019.
Performance
HWHIX vs. CCLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWHIX vs. CCLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWHIX Hotchkis & Wiley High Yield Fund | -1.84% | 7.28% | 7.23% | 12.00% | -11.08% | 6.25% | 3.85% | 2.98% |
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 0.96% | 8.93% | 12.62% | 12.66% | 2.32% | 10.38% | 8.73% | 2.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWHIX achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than CCLFX's 0.96% return.
HWHIX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 6.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.28%
CCLFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 7.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWHIX vs. CCLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWHIX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than CCLFX's 3.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWHIX vs. CCLFX — Risk / Return Rank
HWHIX
CCLFX
HWHIX vs. CCLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley High Yield Fund (HWHIX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWHIX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 8.00 | -6.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 16.02 | -14.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 5.88 | -4.59 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 16.71 | -15.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.11 | 101.68 | -95.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWHIX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 8.00 | -6.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 5.17 | -4.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 4.54 | -3.78 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWHIX and CCLFX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HWHIX vs. CCLFX - Dividend Comparison
HWHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, less than CCLFX's 10.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWHIX Hotchkis & Wiley High Yield Fund | 5.89% | 6.24% | 6.27% | 4.77% | 4.03% | 4.02% | 5.47% | 5.92% | 6.24% | 4.42% | 0.00% | 0.86% |
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 10.37% | 10.47% | 11.27% | 10.96% | 3.96% | 7.03% | 6.90% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HWHIX vs. CCLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWHIX drawdown since its inception was -23.03%, which is greater than CCLFX's maximum drawdown of -3.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWHIX and CCLFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWHIX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.03% | -3.91% | -19.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.14% | -0.46% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.02% | -2.25% | -12.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -0.09% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -0.16% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 0.08% | +0.70% |
Volatility
HWHIX vs. CCLFX - Volatility Comparison
Hotchkis & Wiley High Yield Fund (HWHIX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) at 0.32%. This indicates that HWHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWHIX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 0.32% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.39% | 0.65% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.86% | 0.97% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 1.74% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 1.89% | +3.21% |