HWAY vs. RIFR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HWAY (Themes US Infrastructure ETF) and RIFR (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds. HWAY is passively managed, while RIFR is actively managed. Over the past year, HWAY returned 42.60% vs 12.80% for RIFR. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HWAY charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for RIFR.

Performance

HWAY vs. RIFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWAY achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than RIFR's 8.62% return.

HWAY

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 22.83%
• 6M: 21.62%
• 1Y: 42.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RIFR

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -1.89%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 8.08%
• 1Y: 12.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWAY vs. RIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HWAY Themes US Infrastructure ETF	22.83%	16.76%
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF	8.62%	7.21%

Correlation

The correlation between HWAY and RIFR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

HWAY vs. RIFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWAY

HWAY Risk / Return Rank: 66
HWAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
HWAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
HWAY Omega Ratio Rank: 61
HWAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
HWAY Martin Ratio Rank: 69

RIFR

RIFR Risk / Return Rank: 36
RIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
RIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
RIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
RIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWAY vs. RIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HWAY	RIFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.22	+0.95
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	1.73	+1.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.22	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	1.89	+1.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.51	6.07	+6.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HWAY vs. RIFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the RIFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWAY and RIFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HWAY	RIFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	1.22	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	1.47	-0.22

Drawdowns

HWAY vs. RIFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWAY drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, which is greater than RIFR's maximum drawdown of -6.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWAY and RIFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HWAY	RIFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-6.80%	-19.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.63%	-6.80%	-5.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.26%	-4.18%	+2.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-1.61%	-3.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	2.12%	+1.29%

Volatility

HWAY vs. RIFR - Volatility Comparison

Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) at 3.50%. This indicates that HWAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HWAY	RIFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.31%	3.50%	+3.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.31%	8.52%	+7.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.75%	10.51%	+9.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.42%	10.69%	+11.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.42%	10.69%	+11.73%

HWAY vs. RIFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWAY has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RIFR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

HWAY vs. RIFR - Dividend Comparison

HWAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than RIFR's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HWAY Themes US Infrastructure ETF	1.05%	1.29%	0.22%
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF	0.90%	0.98%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HWAY and RIFR in my portfolio?

HWAY and RIFR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HWAY or RIFR?

HWAY has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to RIFR (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWAY dropped -25.96% vs RIFR's -6.80%.

Which ETF is better, HWAY or RIFR?

On 1-year performance, HWAY leads with 42.60% vs 12.80% for RIFR. On fees, HWAY is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RIFR has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HWAY or RIFR?

Over the 1-year period, HWAY has performed better with a 42.60% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HWAY or RIFR?

HWAY is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RIFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HWAY or RIFR?

HWAY has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.90% for RIFR.

What is the main difference between HWAY and RIFR?

They also come from different issuers: Themes and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HWAY and 0.59% for RIFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HWAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.