PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWAY vs. NATO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWAY vs. NATO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) and Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWAY achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than NATO's 1.39% return.


HWAY

1D
0.93%
1M
3.11%
YTD
22.83%
6M
21.62%
1Y
42.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NATO

1D
-1.87%
1M
2.05%
YTD
1.39%
6M
7.82%
1Y
13.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWAY vs. NATO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HWAY
Themes US Infrastructure ETF
22.83%19.99%-4.70%
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
1.39%50.95%0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between HWAY and NATO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024

0.56

The correlation between HWAY and NATO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWAY vs. NATO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWAY
HWAY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HWAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HWAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWAY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

NATO
NATO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
NATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWAY vs. NATO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) and Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HWAYNATODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

0.65

+1.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.03

1.07

+1.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.13

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

0.85

+2.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.51

2.19

+10.32

HWAY vs. NATO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the NATO Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWAY and NATO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HWAYNATODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

0.65

+1.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Drawdowns

HWAY vs. NATO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWAY drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, which is greater than NATO's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWAY and NATO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWAYNATODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-15.99%

-9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.63%

-15.99%

+3.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-12.30%

+11.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-3.71%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

6.17%

-2.76%

Volatility

HWAY vs. NATO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) is 7.31%, while Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) has a volatility of 7.97%. This indicates that HWAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NATO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWAYNATODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.31%

7.97%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.31%

17.65%

-1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.75%

20.71%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.42%

22.61%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.42%

22.61%

-0.19%

HWAY vs. NATO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWAY has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than NATO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWAY vs. NATO - Dividend Comparison

HWAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than NATO's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HWAY
Themes US Infrastructure ETF
1.05%1.29%0.22%
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
0.44%0.45%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWAY and NATO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NATO has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to HWAY (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWAY dropped -25.96% vs NATO's -15.99%.

On 1-year performance, HWAY leads with 42.60% vs 13.50% for NATO. On fees, HWAY is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HWAY has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HWAY has performed better with a 42.60% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HWAY is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NATO.

HWAY has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.44% for NATO.

HWAY is categorized as Industrials Equities, while NATO is Aerospace & Defense. HWAY tracks Solactive United States Infrastructure Index, while NATO tracks Solactive Transatlantic Aerospace and Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HWAY and 0.35% for NATO.

HWAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWAY and NATO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer