PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HVRRY vs. FJTSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HVRRY vs. FJTSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hannover Re (HVRRY) and Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HVRRY achieves a -12.88% return, which is significantly higher than FJTSY's -19.33% return. Over the past 10 years, HVRRY has underperformed FJTSY with an annualized return of 12.58%, while FJTSY has yielded a comparatively higher 19.10% annualized return.


HVRRY

1D
-0.32%
1M
-9.40%
YTD
-12.88%
6M
-6.28%
1Y
-15.96%
3Y*
12.41%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
12.58%

FJTSY

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.47%
YTD
-19.33%
6M
-15.00%
1Y
-6.35%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
19.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HVRRY vs. FJTSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HVRRY
Hannover Re
-12.88%29.30%7.59%24.53%11.05%20.35%-16.15%48.63%10.97%21.66%
FJTSY
Fujitsu Ltd ADR
-19.33%55.98%17.49%12.77%-22.86%19.18%54.48%49.76%-12.38%29.23%

Correlation

The correlation between HVRRY and FJTSY is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HVRRY:

$31.24B

FJTSY:

$38.24B

EPS

HVRRY:

$4.06

FJTSY:

$257.52

PE Ratio

HVRRY:

10.63

FJTSY:

0.09

PEG Ratio

HVRRY:

0.32

FJTSY:

0.00

PS Ratio

HVRRY:

1.20

FJTSY:

0.01

PB Ratio

HVRRY:

2.25

FJTSY:

0.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

HVRRY:

$25.44B

FJTSY:

$3.55T

Gross Profit (TTM)

HVRRY:

$23.95B

FJTSY:

$1.32T

EBITDA (TTM)

HVRRY:

$9.81B

FJTSY:

$439.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HVRRY vs. FJTSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HVRRY
HVRRY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HVRRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HVRRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
HVRRY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HVRRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HVRRY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FJTSY
FJTSY Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FJTSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJTSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJTSY Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FJTSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJTSY Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HVRRY vs. FJTSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hannover Re (HVRRY) and Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HVRRYFJTSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.01

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

-0.19

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.87

-0.42

-1.44

HVRRY vs. FJTSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HVRRY Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the FJTSY Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HVRRY and FJTSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HVRRYFJTSYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.74

-0.15

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.16

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.21

+0.17

Drawdowns

HVRRY vs. FJTSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HVRRY drawdown since its inception was -62.80%, roughly equal to the maximum FJTSY drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HVRRY and FJTSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HVRRYFJTSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.80%

-62.04%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

-33.59%

+15.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-33.59%

+15.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.66%

-47.55%

+15.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.24%

-47.55%

+3.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.62%

-24.33%

+6.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-22.75%

+14.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.56%

15.04%

-6.48%

Volatility

HVRRY vs. FJTSY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hannover Re (HVRRY) is 5.23%, while Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY) has a volatility of 13.74%. This indicates that HVRRY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FJTSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HVRRYFJTSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

13.74%

-8.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.58%

34.57%

-17.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.72%

43.06%

-21.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.13%

33.78%

-8.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.28%

31.81%

-5.53%

Dividends

HVRRY vs. FJTSY - Dividend Comparison

HVRRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, while FJTSY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJTSY
Fujitsu Ltd ADR
0.00%0.36%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.63%1.30%1.30%
HVRRY
Hannover Re
5.64%3.19%3.10%2.75%3.15%2.92%2.75%2.19%3.27%4.55%8.64%1.19%

Financials

HVRRY vs. FJTSY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hannover Re and Fujitsu Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T1.20T20222023202420252026
7.31B
1.07T
(HVRRY) Total Revenue
(FJTSY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HVRRY vs. FJTSY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hannover Re and Fujitsu Ltd ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
42.8%
Portfolio components
HVRRY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hannover Re reported a gross profit of 7.31B and revenue of 7.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

FJTSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 458.88B and revenue of 1.07T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.8%.

HVRRY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hannover Re reported an operating income of 965.32M and revenue of 7.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.2%.

FJTSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 154.67B and revenue of 1.07T, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

HVRRY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hannover Re reported a net income of 722.29M and revenue of 7.31B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.

FJTSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported a net income of 107.66B and revenue of 1.07T, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HVRRY and FJTSY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FJTSY has higher volatility (13.74%) compared to HVRRY (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HVRRY dropped -62.80% vs FJTSY's -62.04%.

FJTSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HVRRY and FJTSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer