PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HVOI.TO vs. YAVG.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HVOI.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO) and Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HVOI.TO achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than YAVG.NEO's 44.89% return.


HVOI.TO

1D
0.28%
1M
1.05%
6M
11.45%
YTD
11.03%
1Y
20.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.02%

YAVG.NEO

1D
13.56%
1M
19.71%
6M
56.88%
YTD
44.89%
1Y
80.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
75.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$34.24KCA$36.50KCA$47.47K
CA$129.79KCA$111.65KCA$131.34K

HVOI.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HVOI.TO and YAVG.NEO is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2025

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HVOI.TO vs. YAVG.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HVOI.TO
HVOI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
HVOI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

YAVG.NEO
YAVG.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
YAVG.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAVG.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAVG.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
YAVG.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAVG.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HVOI.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO) and Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HVOI.TOYAVG.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.14

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.03

7.06

+4.97

HVOI.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HVOI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the YAVG.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HVOI.TO and YAVG.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HVOI.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HVOI.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.72%, smaller than the maximum YAVG.NEO drawdown of -40.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HVOI.TO and YAVG.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HVOI.TOYAVG.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-40.03%

+33.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-25.90%

+19.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-9.87%

+8.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-9.46%

+8.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

11.48%

-9.80%

Volatility

HVOI.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO) is 2.18%, while Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that HVOI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAVG.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HVOI.TOYAVG.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

16.60%

-14.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.92%

45.34%

-38.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.81%

57.11%

-48.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.31%

56.12%

-47.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.31%

56.12%

-47.81%

HVOI.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HVOI.TO has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than YAVG.NEO's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

HVOI.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Dividend Comparison

HVOI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, less than YAVG.NEO's 27.31% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HVOI.TO and YAVG.NEO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HVOI.TO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HVOI.TO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for YAVG.NEO.

They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for HVOI.TO and 1.19% for YAVG.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HVOI.TO and YAVG.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer