PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HVOI.TO vs. QQCI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HVOI.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HVOI.TO achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than QQCI.TO's 16.78% return.


HVOI.TO

1D
0.28%
1M
1.05%
6M
11.45%
YTD
11.03%
1Y
20.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.02%

QQCI.TO

1D
4.27%
1M
-0.13%
6M
16.86%
YTD
16.78%
1Y
29.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$34.24KCA$36.50KCA$47.47K
CA$127.06KCA$114.04KCA$155.19K

HVOI.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HVOI.TO and QQCI.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HVOI.TO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HVOI.TO
HVOI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
HVOI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

QQCI.TO
QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HVOI.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HVOI.TOQQCI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.48

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.03

11.50

+0.53

HVOI.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HVOI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HVOI.TO and QQCI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HVOI.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HVOI.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.72%, smaller than the maximum QQCI.TO drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HVOI.TO and QQCI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HVOI.TOQQCI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-18.95%

+12.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-8.48%

+1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-1.82%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-3.07%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.56%

-0.88%

Volatility

HVOI.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO) is 2.18%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that HVOI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HVOI.TOQQCI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

6.46%

-4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.92%

12.18%

-5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.81%

15.41%

-6.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.31%

16.18%

-7.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.31%

16.18%

-7.87%

HVOI.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HVOI.TO has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than QQCI.TO's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

HVOI.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison

HVOI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, less than QQCI.TO's 8.94% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HVOI.TO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQCI.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQCI.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for HVOI.TO.

HVOI.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQCI.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and CI. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for HVOI.TO and 0.21% for QQCI.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HVOI.TO and QQCI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer