HUZ.TO vs. HXT.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO).
HUZ.TO and HXT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUZ.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2009. HXT.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX 60 Index. It was launched on Sep 14, 2010. Both HUZ.TO and HXT.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HUZ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HUZ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUZ.TO Global X Silver ETF | 5.82% | 129.20% | 18.72% | -3.75% | 1.17% | -15.10% | 39.27% | 12.48% | -11.38% | 2.96% |
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF | 2.91% | 28.74% | 20.94% | 12.02% | -6.27% | 28.11% | 5.36% | 22.18% | -7.89% | 9.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUZ.TO achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly higher than HXT.TO's 2.91% return. Over the past 10 years, HUZ.TO has outperformed HXT.TO with an annualized return of 13.41%, while HXT.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.62% annualized return.
HUZ.TO
- 1D
- 7.32%
- 1M
- -20.09%
- YTD
- 5.82%
- 6M
- 57.40%
- 1Y
- 105.90%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 20.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
HXT.TO
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 30.31%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- 14.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HUZ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUZ.TO has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than HXT.TO's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HUZ.TO vs. HXT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUZ.TO
HXT.TO
HUZ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUZ.TO | HXT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 2.11 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 2.73 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 2.92 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.66 | 14.17 | -6.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUZ.TO | HXT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.11 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 1.13 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.84 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.67 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between HUZ.TO and HXT.TO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HUZ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HUZ.TO nor HXT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
HUZ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUZ.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.06%, which is greater than HXT.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUZ.TO and HXT.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUZ.TO | HXT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.06% | -35.48% | -45.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.11% | -10.76% | -32.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.11% | -16.33% | -26.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.84% | -35.48% | -13.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.03% | -3.90% | -32.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.11% | -4.70% | -50.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.90% | 2.22% | +11.68% |
Volatility
HUZ.TO vs. HXT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.07% compared to Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) at 5.32%. This indicates that HUZ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HUZ.TO | HXT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.07% | 5.32% | +13.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.44% | 9.76% | +47.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.58% | 14.44% | +43.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.48% | 12.70% | +23.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.76% | 15.15% | +17.61% |