PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUTE.TO vs. EBNK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HUTE.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) and Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HUTE.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HUTE.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF
12.55%19.04%18.15%0.09%7.10%
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD
-4.60%60.13%28.78%20.83%9.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUTE.TO achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly higher than EBNK.TO's -4.60% return.


HUTE.TO

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
12.55%
6M
13.89%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
10Y*

EBNK.TO

1D
1.86%
1M
-7.58%
YTD
-4.60%
6M
6.07%
1Y
26.42%
3Y*
32.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HUTE.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUTE.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EBNK.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HUTE.TO vs. EBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUTE.TO
HUTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

EBNK.TO
EBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTE.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) and Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUTE.TOEBNK.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

0.92

+0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

1.46

+0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.20

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

1.50

+0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.38

6.16

+3.23

HUTE.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUTE.TO and EBNK.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUTE.TOEBNK.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

0.92

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.79

+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between HUTE.TO and EBNK.TO is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HUTE.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, less than EBNK.TO's 10.81% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
HUTE.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF
8.09%9.64%10.24%10.70%1.61%
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD
10.81%11.05%12.56%7.32%7.52%

Drawdowns

HUTE.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.36%, smaller than the maximum EBNK.TO drawdown of -31.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTE.TO and EBNK.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HUTE.TOEBNK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.36%

-31.02%

+12.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-17.39%

+8.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-11.20%

+8.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-7.56%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

4.24%

-1.95%

Volatility

HUTE.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) is 4.61%, while Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that HUTE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HUTE.TOEBNK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

9.36%

-4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

14.91%

-7.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.94%

28.95%

-15.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.26%

27.02%

-12.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.26%

27.02%

-12.76%