PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUT vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HUT vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUT achieves a 158.73% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 229.54% return.


HUT

1D
2.19%
1M
9.73%
YTD
158.73%
6M
187.73%
1Y
547.39%
3Y*
124.18%
5Y*
42.31%
10Y*

MRVL

1D
-0.36%
1M
57.18%
YTD
229.54%
6M
231.70%
1Y
302.72%
3Y*
64.86%
5Y*
40.49%
10Y*
40.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUT vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HUT
Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock
158.73%124.21%53.60%213.88%-89.17%185.45%250.63%-25.02%-70.80%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
229.54%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%65.74%-30.78%

Correlation

The correlation between HUT and MRVL is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2018

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HUT:

$13.20B

MRVL:

$249.86B

EPS

HUT:

-$2.73

MRVL:

$2.90

PB Ratio

HUT:

9.57

MRVL:

13.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

HUT:

-$40.96M

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HUT:

-$132.19M

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

HUT:

-$306.16M

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUT vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUT
HUT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUT vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HUTMRVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.55

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.30

11.57

+2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.93

26.42

+12.52

HUT vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUT Sharpe Ratio is 5.35, which is comparable to the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 4.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUT and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUT vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUT drawdown since its inception was -95.04%, roughly equal to the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUT and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUTMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.04%

-91.60%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.62%

-26.36%

-12.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.68%

-60.79%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.04%

-61.88%

-33.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.65%

-11.61%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.55%

-46.74%

-16.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.16%

11.52%

+2.64%

Volatility

HUT vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT) is 26.86%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 40.61%. This indicates that HUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUTMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.86%

40.61%

-13.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.73%

55.42%

+21.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

103.29%

70.94%

+32.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.62%

61.82%

+43.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.75%

51.94%

+62.81%

Dividends

HUT vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

HUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HUT
Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.09%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%

Financials

HUT vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
71.02M
2.42B
(HUT) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HUT and MRVL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (40.61%) compared to HUT (26.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUT dropped -95.04% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

HUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs 4.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUT and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer