HUT vs. JEPQ
HUT (Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock) is a stock, while JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, HUT returned 129.93%/yr vs 20.92%/yr for JEPQ. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HUT vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUT achieves a 185.79% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 9.54% return.
HUT
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 68.15%
- YTD
- 185.79%
- 6M
- 228.06%
- 1Y
- 717.50%
- 3Y*
- 129.93%
- 5Y*
- 46.13%
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HUT vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUT Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock | 185.79% | 124.21% | 53.60% | 213.88% | -78.80% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 9.54% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUT and JEPQ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.51 |
The correlation between HUT and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUT vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
HUT
JEPQ
HUT vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.49 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.76 | 3.31 | +15.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 51.68 | 16.22 | +35.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.07 | 2.49 | +4.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 1.00 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
HUT vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUT drawdown since its inception was -95.04%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUT and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.04% | -20.07% | -74.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.62% | -8.82% | -29.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.68% | -20.07% | -51.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.10% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.75% | -3.42% | -60.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.99% | 1.79% | +12.20% |
Volatility
HUT vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT) has a higher volatility of 35.48% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 1.26%. This indicates that HUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.48% | 1.26% | +34.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.12% | 9.07% | +67.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.50% | 11.73% | +90.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.22% | 16.61% | +89.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.77% | 16.61% | +98.16% |
Dividends
HUT vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
HUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUT Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.07% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUT and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUT has higher volatility (35.48%) compared to JEPQ (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUT dropped -95.04% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
HUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.07 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUT and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer