HURA.TO vs. QQCC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO).
HURA.TO and QQCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HURA.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. It was launched on May 15, 2019. QQCC.TO is managed by Global X. It was launched on Sep 13, 2011.
Performance
HURA.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HURA.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HURA.TO Global X Uranium Index ETF | 11.72% | 43.18% | 3.05% | 61.03% | -4.56% | 71.05% | 65.97% | -16.96% |
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | -3.61% | 11.64% | 33.48% | 35.99% | -8.51% | 7.92% | -3.26% | 8.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HURA.TO achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than QQCC.TO's -3.61% return.
HURA.TO
- 1D
- 4.70%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 107.11%
- 3Y*
- 37.96%
- 5Y*
- 27.92%
- 10Y*
- —
QQCC.TO
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -3.61%
- 6M
- -1.75%
- 1Y
- 15.14%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HURA.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HURA.TO has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QQCC.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HURA.TO vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HURA.TO
QQCC.TO
HURA.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HURA.TO | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 0.75 | +1.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.86 | 1.12 | +1.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.18 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 1.15 | +2.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.02 | 5.03 | +3.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HURA.TO | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 0.75 | +1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.73 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | -0.00 | +0.77 |
Correlation
The correlation between HURA.TO and QQCC.TO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HURA.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
HURA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than QQCC.TO's 11.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HURA.TO Global X Uranium Index ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.75% | 1.03% | 1.46% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 11.12% | 11.27% | 9.89% | 11.85% | 11.04% | 5.15% | 5.84% | 6.31% | 7.90% | 6.01% | 6.73% | 8.89% |
Drawdowns
HURA.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HURA.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum QQCC.TO drawdown of -100.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HURA.TO and QQCC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HURA.TO | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -100.13% | +56.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.61% | -13.73% | -16.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.97% | -22.24% | -20.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.39% | -100.00% | +77.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.35% | -99.78% | +85.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.03% | 3.15% | +9.88% |
Volatility
HURA.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.09% compared to Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) at 5.36%. This indicates that HURA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HURA.TO | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.09% | 5.36% | +7.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.50% | 10.43% | +27.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.83% | 20.26% | +27.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.88% | 17.51% | +22.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.67% | 17.30% | +21.37% |