PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUN.TO vs. HUG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUN.TO vs. HUG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Natural Gas ETF (HUN.TO) and Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUN.TO achieves a -4.38% return, which is significantly lower than HUG.TO's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, HUN.TO has underperformed HUG.TO with an annualized return of 6.09%, while HUG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.69% annualized return.


HUN.TO

1D
-0.13%
1M
-6.67%
YTD
-4.38%
6M
-11.35%
1Y
-16.44%
3Y*
-7.05%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
6.09%

HUG.TO

1D
-1.21%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
1.43%
6M
3.69%
1Y
27.81%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
15.83%
10Y*
10.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUN.TO vs. HUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUN.TO
Global X Natural Gas ETF
-4.38%-5.60%10.19%-39.99%52.18%67.65%8.69%-11.59%50.53%-24.03%
HUG.TO
Global X Gold ETF
1.43%57.93%24.13%11.48%-1.87%-5.30%19.82%15.86%-4.52%10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between HUN.TO and HUG.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2009

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUN.TO vs. HUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUN.TO
HUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
HUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

HUG.TO
HUG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HUG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
HUG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUN.TO vs. HUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Natural Gas ETF (HUN.TO) and Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUN.TOHUG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.21

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

1.45

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

3.47

-4.47

HUN.TO vs. HUG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUN.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the HUG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUN.TO and HUG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUN.TOHUG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.54

1.06

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.87

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.65

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.43

-0.43

Drawdowns

HUN.TO vs. HUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.33%, which is greater than HUG.TO's maximum drawdown of -47.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUN.TO and HUG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUN.TOHUG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.33%

-47.99%

-37.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.56%

-19.27%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.11%

-19.27%

-18.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.00%

-22.06%

-45.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.00%

-24.66%

-43.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.12%

-18.57%

-47.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.23%

-22.96%

-41.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.51%

8.03%

+8.48%

Volatility

HUN.TO vs. HUG.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Natural Gas ETF (HUN.TO) and Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO) have volatilities of 6.11% and 5.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUN.TOHUG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

5.89%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.03%

22.75%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.45%

26.49%

+3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.16%

18.25%

+22.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.86%

16.41%

+18.45%

HUN.TO vs. HUG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUN.TO has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HUG.TO's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

HUN.TO vs. HUG.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HUN.TO nor HUG.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HUG.TO
Global X Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUN.TO
Global X Natural Gas ETF
0.00%0.00%12.17%11.26%5.52%6.84%9.49%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUN.TO and HUG.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HUG.TO is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUG.TO is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 1.40% for HUN.TO.

HUN.TO is categorized as Commodities, while HUG.TO is Gold. HUN.TO tracks Solactive Natural Gas Winter MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while HUG.TO tracks Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER. Their fees differ too: 1.40% for HUN.TO and 0.54% for HUG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUN.TO and HUG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer