PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HUN.TO vs. HSAV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HUN.TO vs. HSAV.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HUN.TO (Global X Natural Gas ETF) and HSAV.TO (Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUN.TO is a Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Natural Gas Winter MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while HSAV.TO is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Global X. HUN.TO is passively managed, while HSAV.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HUN.TO returned 6.04%/yr vs 3.20%/yr for HSAV.TO. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. HUN.TO charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for HSAV.TO.

Performance

HUN.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Natural Gas ETF (HUN.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUN.TO achieves a -4.38% return, which is significantly lower than HSAV.TO's 1.04% return.

HUN.TO

1D
-0.13%
1M
-6.67%
YTD
-4.38%
6M
-11.35%
1Y
-16.44%
3Y*
-7.05%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
6.09%

HSAV.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.15%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.55%
1Y
2.70%
3Y*
3.71%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUN.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HUN.TO
Global X Natural Gas ETF		-4.38%-5.60%10.19%-39.99%52.18%67.65%16.09%
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF		1.04%2.58%4.24%5.04%2.79%0.66%0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between HUN.TO and HSAV.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2020

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Natural Gas ETF

Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF

Often compared with HUN.TO:
HUN.TO vs. HUC.TOHUN.TO vs. ZCOM.NEOHUN.TO vs. CCOM.TOHUN.TO vs. CASH.TOHUN.TO vs. CHPS.TOHUN.TO vs. HBNK.TOHUN.TO vs. CBIL.TO
Often compared with HSAV.TO:
HSAV.TO vs. CASH.TOHSAV.TO vs. ZMMK.TOHSAV.TO vs. CBIL.TOHSAV.TO vs. PSA.TOHSAV.TO vs. CSAV.TOHSAV.TO vs. SGOVHSAV.TO vs. CMR.TO

Return for Risk

HUN.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HUN.TO
HUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
HUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO
HSAV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUN.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Natural Gas ETF (HUN.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HUN.TOHSAV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.54
1.96

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.61
2.93

-3.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.37

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

4.58

-5.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

12.46

-13.46

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HUN.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUN.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the HSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUN.TO and HSAV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HUN.TOHSAV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.54

1.96

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

1.82

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

1.72

-1.72

Drawdowns

HUN.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.33%, which is greater than HSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUN.TO and HSAV.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HUN.TOHSAV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.33%

-2.18%

-83.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.56%

-0.59%

-24.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.11%

-1.06%

-37.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.00%

-2.18%

-65.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.00%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.12%

-0.18%

-65.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.23%

-0.19%

-64.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.51%

0.22%

+16.29%

Volatility

HUN.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Natural Gas ETF (HUN.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) at 0.48%. This indicates that HUN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HUN.TOHSAV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

0.48%

+5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.03%

1.05%

+21.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.45%

1.39%

+29.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.16%

1.77%

+39.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.86%

1.58%

+33.28%

HUN.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUN.TO has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HSAV.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUN.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HUN.TO nor HSAV.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUN.TO
Global X Natural Gas ETF		0.00%0.00%12.17%11.26%5.52%6.84%9.49%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

HUN.TO and HSAV.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSAV.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSAV.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.40% for HUN.TO.

HUN.TO is categorized as Commodities, while HSAV.TO is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 1.40% for HUN.TO and 0.18% for HSAV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUN.TO and HSAV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer