HUM.TO vs. HCA.TO
HUM.TO (Hamilton U.S. Mid-Cap Financials ETF) and HCA.TO (Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUM.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Hamilton, while HCA.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index. HUM.TO is actively managed, while HCA.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HUM.TO returned 9.45%/yr vs 20.83%/yr for HCA.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HUM.TO vs. HCA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUM.TO achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly lower than HCA.TO's 37.85% return.
HUM.TO
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 4.01%
- 1Y
- 7.60%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- —
HCA.TO
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 8.11%
- 6M
- 37.03%
- YTD
- 37.85%
- 1Y
- 78.38%
- 3Y*
- 36.60%
- 5Y*
- 20.83%
- 10Y*
- —
HUM.TO vs. HCA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUM.TO Hamilton U.S. Mid-Cap Financials ETF | 4.01% | 4.39% | 12.82% | 23.80% | -11.26% | 41.41% | -7.33% | 25.28% | -19.35% |
HCA.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF | 37.85% | 46.37% | 17.62% | 12.03% | -13.32% | 35.11% | 33.62% | 9.21% | -14.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUM.TO and HCA.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUM.TO vs. HCA.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUM.TO
HCA.TO
HUM.TO vs. HCA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. Mid-Cap Financials ETF (HUM.TO) and Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF (HCA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUM.TO | HCA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 2.12 | -1.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 9.25 | -8.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | 41.83 | -40.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUM.TO vs. HCA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUM.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.06%, which is greater than HCA.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUM.TO and HCA.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUM.TO | HCA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.06% | -37.89% | -11.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.68% | -8.52% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.97% | -15.52% | -16.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.43% | -27.97% | -6.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.68% | 0.00% | -13.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.32% | -7.64% | -7.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.00% | 1.88% | +4.12% |
Volatility
HUM.TO vs. HCA.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton U.S. Mid-Cap Financials ETF (HUM.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF (HCA.TO) at 4.05%. This indicates that HUM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HCA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUM.TO | HCA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 4.05% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 11.50% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.65% | 13.54% | +4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.07% | 14.15% | +47.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.46% | 22.79% | +40.67% |
Dividends
HUM.TO vs. HCA.TO - Dividend Comparison
HUM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than HCA.TO's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCA.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF | 2.55% | 3.44% | 4.42% | 8.53% | 5.45% | 3.56% | 3.54% |
HUM.TO Hamilton U.S. Mid-Cap Financials ETF | 1.27% | 1.26% | 1.19% | 1.35% | 3.58% | 2.18% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUM.TO and HCA.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUM.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while HCA.TO is Canada Equities.
Find the right allocation for HUM.TO and HCA.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer