HUM.TO vs. FIE.TO
HUM.TO (Hamilton U.S. Mid-Cap Financials ETF) and FIE.TO (iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HUM.TO returned 9.45%/yr vs 14.03%/yr for FIE.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HUM.TO vs. FIE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUM.TO achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly lower than FIE.TO's 18.97% return.
HUM.TO
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 4.01%
- 1Y
- 7.60%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- —
FIE.TO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- YTD
- 18.97%
- 1Y
- 35.03%
- 3Y*
- 26.36%
- 5Y*
- 14.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
HUM.TO vs. FIE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUM.TO Hamilton U.S. Mid-Cap Financials ETF | 4.01% | 4.39% | 12.82% | 23.80% | -11.26% | 41.41% | -7.33% | 25.28% | -26.84% |
FIE.TO iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF | 18.97% | 24.36% | 27.62% | 12.58% | -14.35% | 27.34% | 1.33% | 18.97% | -9.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUM.TO and FIE.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2018 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUM.TO vs. FIE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUM.TO
FIE.TO
HUM.TO vs. FIE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. Mid-Cap Financials ETF (HUM.TO) and iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF (FIE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUM.TO | FIE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.75 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 4.89 | -4.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | 15.90 | -14.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUM.TO vs. FIE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUM.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.06%, which is greater than FIE.TO's maximum drawdown of -42.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUM.TO and FIE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUM.TO | FIE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.06% | -42.24% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.68% | -7.19% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.97% | -10.70% | -21.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.43% | -22.93% | -11.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.68% | 0.00% | -13.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.32% | -4.86% | -10.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.00% | 2.21% | +3.79% |
Volatility
HUM.TO vs. FIE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton U.S. Mid-Cap Financials ETF (HUM.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF (FIE.TO) at 2.32%. This indicates that HUM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUM.TO | FIE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 2.32% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 7.33% | +5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.65% | 9.22% | +8.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.07% | 10.58% | +51.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.46% | 14.05% | +49.41% |
Dividends
HUM.TO vs. FIE.TO - Dividend Comparison
HUM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than FIE.TO's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIE.TO iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF | 4.19% | 4.94% | 5.83% | 6.98% | 7.31% | 5.92% | 7.10% | 6.65% | 7.38% | 6.28% | 6.59% | 7.43% |
HUM.TO Hamilton U.S. Mid-Cap Financials ETF | 1.27% | 1.26% | 1.19% | 1.35% | 3.58% | 2.18% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUM.TO and FIE.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and iShares.
Find the right allocation for HUM.TO and FIE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer