HULC.TO vs. XUSC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HULC.TO (Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF) and XUSC.TO (iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - HULC.TO tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index (CA NTR) while XUSC.TO tracks the S&P 500 3% Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HULC.TO returned 29.64% vs 27.68% for XUSC.TO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HULC.TO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUSC.TO.

Performance

HULC.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) and iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HULC.TO having a 12.50% return and XUSC.TO slightly higher at 12.69%.

HULC.TO

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 7.49%
• YTD: 12.50%
• 6M: 10.64%
• 1Y: 29.64%
• 3Y*: 24.34%
• 5Y*: 34.17%
• 10Y*: —

XUSC.TO

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 7.55%
• YTD: 12.69%
• 6M: 10.97%
• 1Y: 27.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HULC.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HULC.TO Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF	12.50%	12.69%	12.23%
XUSC.TO iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)	12.69%	11.40%	11.76%

Correlation

The correlation between HULC.TO and XUSC.TO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	0.90

The correlation between HULC.TO and XUSC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HULC.TO vs. XUSC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HULC.TO

HULC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 71
HULC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
HULC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
HULC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 75
HULC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
HULC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

XUSC.TO

XUSC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 75
XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
XUSC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XUSC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 75
XUSC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XUSC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HULC.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) and iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HULC.TO	XUSC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	2.43	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.39	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.44	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	3.66	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.23	13.42	-1.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HULC.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HULC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HULC.TO and XUSC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HULC.TO	XUSC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	2.43	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	1.27	-0.52

Drawdowns

HULC.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HULC.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.94%, which is greater than XUSC.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HULC.TO and XUSC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HULC.TO	XUSC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.94%	-18.31%	-5.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	-7.60%	-1.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-2.67%	-2.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	2.07%	+0.36%

Volatility

HULC.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) at 2.61%. This indicates that HULC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUSC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HULC.TO	XUSC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	2.61%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.25%	8.51%	+0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.53%	11.46%	+1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.99%	15.72%	+31.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.82%	15.72%	+28.10%

HULC.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HULC.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XUSC.TO's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HULC.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HULC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUSC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HULC.TO Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XUSC.TO iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)	0.84%	0.94%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HULC.TO and XUSC.TO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, HULC.TO and XUSC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, HULC.TO or XUSC.TO?

On fees, HULC.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HULC.TO or XUSC.TO?

HULC.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XUSC.TO.

What is the main difference between HULC.TO and XUSC.TO?

HULC.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap Index (CA NTR), while XUSC.TO tracks S&P 500 3% Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HULC.TO and 0.12% for XUSC.TO.