HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO
HULC.TO (Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF) and VUN.TO (Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - HULC.TO tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index (CA NTR) while VUN.TO tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HULC.TO returned 34.17%/yr vs 15.50%/yr for VUN.TO. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HULC.TO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for VUN.TO.
Performance
HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HULC.TO having a 12.50% return and VUN.TO slightly lower at 12.43%.
HULC.TO
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 29.64%
- 3Y*
- 24.34%
- 5Y*
- 34.17%
- 10Y*
- —
VUN.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HULC.TO Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF | 12.50% | 12.69% | 35.93% | 24.43% | -14.75% | 153.78% | 26.06% |
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 12.43% | 11.43% | 33.76% | 23.00% | -14.20% | 24.54% | 24.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between HULC.TO and VUN.TO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.77 |
The correlation between HULC.TO and VUN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HULC.TO
VUN.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
HULC.TO
VUN.TO
Communication Services
HULC.TO
VUN.TO
Financial Services
HULC.TO
VUN.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HULC.TO
VUN.TO
Healthcare
HULC.TO
VUN.TO
Industrials
HULC.TO
VUN.TO
Consumer Defensive
HULC.TO
VUN.TO
Energy
HULC.TO
VUN.TO
Utilities
HULC.TO
VUN.TO
Basic Materials
HULC.TO
VUN.TO
Real Estate
HULC.TO
VUN.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HULC.TO
VUN.TO
HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HULC.TO | VUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.46 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.23 | 12.96 | -0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HULC.TO | VUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 2.47 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 1.01 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.01 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HULC.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.94%, smaller than the maximum VUN.TO drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HULC.TO and VUN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HULC.TO | VUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.94% | -28.19% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -8.51% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.46% | -19.88% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.94% | -23.67% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.39% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -3.80% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 2.27% | +0.16% |
Volatility
HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) have volatilities of 3.01% and 3.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HULC.TO | VUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 3.04% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | 8.81% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.53% | 11.97% | +0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.99% | 15.43% | +31.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.82% | 16.70% | +27.12% |
HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HULC.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VUN.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Dividend Comparison
HULC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HULC.TO Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 1.10% | 1.21% | 0.97% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 1.39% | 1.49% | 1.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, HULC.TO and VUN.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, HULC.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HULC.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for VUN.TO.
HULC.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap Index (CA NTR), while VUN.TO tracks CRSP US Total Market Index CAD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HULC.TO and 0.17% for VUN.TO.
Find the right allocation for HULC.TO and VUN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer