PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HULC.TO having a 12.50% return and VUN.TO slightly lower at 12.43%.


HULC.TO

1D
-0.15%
1M
7.49%
YTD
12.50%
6M
10.64%
1Y
29.64%
3Y*
24.34%
5Y*
34.17%
10Y*

VUN.TO

1D
-0.39%
1M
7.17%
YTD
12.43%
6M
10.44%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
15.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HULC.TO
Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF
12.50%12.69%35.93%24.43%-14.75%153.78%26.06%
VUN.TO
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF
12.43%11.43%33.76%23.00%-14.20%24.54%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HULC.TO and VUN.TO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020

0.77

The correlation between HULC.TO and VUN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HULC.TO
VUN.TO

Technology

35.3%
31.5%

Communication Services

11.6%
9.7%

Financial Services

11.5%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.8%
10.2%

Industrials

8.5%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.0%

Energy

3.6%
4.2%

Utilities

2.3%
2.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.5%

Technology

HULC.TO
35.3%
VUN.TO
31.5%

Communication Services

HULC.TO
11.6%
VUN.TO
9.7%

Financial Services

HULC.TO
11.5%
VUN.TO
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HULC.TO
10.0%
VUN.TO
10.0%

Healthcare

HULC.TO
8.8%
VUN.TO
10.2%

Industrials

HULC.TO
8.5%
VUN.TO
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

HULC.TO
4.8%
VUN.TO
5.0%

Energy

HULC.TO
3.6%
VUN.TO
4.2%

Utilities

HULC.TO
2.3%
VUN.TO
2.5%

Basic Materials

HULC.TO
1.8%
VUN.TO
2.2%

Real Estate

HULC.TO
1.8%
VUN.TO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HULC.TO
HULC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HULC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HULC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
HULC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HULC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HULC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VUN.TO
VUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HULC.TOVUN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.45

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

3.46

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

12.96

-0.73

HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HULC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HULC.TO and VUN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HULC.TOVUN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.47

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

1.01

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.01

-0.26

Drawdowns

HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HULC.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.94%, smaller than the maximum VUN.TO drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HULC.TO and VUN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HULC.TOVUN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.94%

-28.19%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-8.51%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.46%

-19.88%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.94%

-23.67%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.39%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-3.80%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.27%

+0.16%

Volatility

HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) have volatilities of 3.01% and 3.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HULC.TOVUN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

3.04%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

8.81%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

11.97%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.99%

15.43%

+31.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.82%

16.70%

+27.12%

HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HULC.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VUN.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HULC.TO vs. VUN.TO - Dividend Comparison

HULC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HULC.TO
Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUN.TO
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF
0.74%0.84%0.93%1.10%1.21%0.97%1.15%1.45%1.52%1.39%1.49%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, HULC.TO and VUN.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HULC.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HULC.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for VUN.TO.

HULC.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap Index (CA NTR), while VUN.TO tracks CRSP US Total Market Index CAD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HULC.TO and 0.17% for VUN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HULC.TO and VUN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer