HULC.TO vs. HPYB.TO
HULC.TO (Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF) and HPYB.TO (Harvest Premium Yield Canadian Bank ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. HULC.TO is passively managed, while HPYB.TO is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HULC.TO vs. HPYB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HULC.TO
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 29.64%
- 3Y*
- 24.34%
- 5Y*
- 34.17%
- 10Y*
- —
HPYB.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HULC.TO vs. HPYB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HULC.TO Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF | 11.13% |
HPYB.TO Harvest Premium Yield Canadian Bank ETF | 10.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between HULC.TO and HPYB.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HULC.TO vs. HPYB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HULC.TO
HPYB.TO
HULC.TO vs. HPYB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield Canadian Bank ETF (HPYB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HULC.TO | HPYB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HULC.TO | HPYB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 2.52 | -1.77 |
Drawdowns
HULC.TO vs. HPYB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HULC.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.94%, which is greater than HPYB.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HULC.TO and HPYB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HULC.TO | HPYB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.94% | -6.37% | -17.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.94% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -1.40% | -3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | — | — |
Volatility
HULC.TO vs. HPYB.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HULC.TO | HPYB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.53% | 12.87% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.99% | 12.87% | +34.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.82% | 12.87% | +30.95% |
Dividends
HULC.TO vs. HPYB.TO - Dividend Comparison
HULC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HPYB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
HPYB.TO Harvest Premium Yield Canadian Bank ETF | 5.02% |
HULC.TO Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HULC.TO and HPYB.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest.
Find the right allocation for HULC.TO and HPYB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer