HULC.TO vs. HBF.TO
HULC.TO (Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF) and HBF.TO (Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - HULC.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap Index (CA NTR), while HBF.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. HULC.TO is passively managed, while HBF.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HULC.TO returned 15.77%/yr vs 7.06%/yr for HBF.TO. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HULC.TO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HBF.TO.
Performance
HULC.TO vs. HBF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HULC.TO achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly higher than HBF.TO's 4.77% return.
HULC.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 26.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.77%
- 10Y*
- —
HBF.TO
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.15%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.01%
HULC.TO vs. HBF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HULC.TO Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF | 12.06% | 12.69% | 35.93% | 24.43% | -14.75% | 26.89% | 27.48% |
HBF.TO Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) | 4.77% | 15.51% | 13.12% | 11.23% | -14.97% | 21.90% | 19.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between HULC.TO and HBF.TO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | 0.61 |
The correlation between HULC.TO and HBF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HULC.TO vs. HBF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HULC.TO
HBF.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
HULC.TO
HBF.TO
Communication Services
HULC.TO
HBF.TO
Financial Services
HULC.TO
HBF.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HULC.TO
HBF.TO
Healthcare
HULC.TO
HBF.TO
Industrials
HULC.TO
HBF.TO
Consumer Defensive
HULC.TO
HBF.TO
Energy
HULC.TO
HBF.TO
Utilities
HULC.TO
HBF.TO
-
Basic Materials
HULC.TO
HBF.TO
-
Real Estate
HULC.TO
HBF.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HULC.TO vs. HBF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HULC.TO
HBF.TO
HULC.TO vs. HBF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) and Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HULC.TO | HBF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.32 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.43 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.83 | 9.43 | +1.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HULC.TO vs. HBF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HULC.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.94%, smaller than the maximum HBF.TO drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HULC.TO and HBF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HULC.TO | HBF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.94% | -35.27% | +11.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -7.79% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.46% | -15.25% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.94% | -23.69% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -4.24% | +2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -6.74% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 2.00% | +0.46% |
Volatility
HULC.TO vs. HBF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO) at 3.67%. This indicates that HULC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HULC.TO | HBF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 3.67% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 8.25% | +1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 10.70% | +2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 14.09% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 16.96% | +2.23% |
HULC.TO vs. HBF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HULC.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than HBF.TO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HULC.TO vs. HBF.TO - Dividend Comparison
HULC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBF.TO Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) | 7.65% | 7.27% | 7.48% | 7.52% | 7.75% | 5.64% | 6.36% | 6.60% | 7.75% | 6.88% | 7.57% | 7.77% |
HULC.TO Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HULC.TO and HBF.TO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HULC.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HULC.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HBF.TO.
HULC.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HBF.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest Portfolios Group. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HULC.TO and 0.75% for HBF.TO.
Find the right allocation for HULC.TO and HBF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer