HUC.TO vs. REMX
HUC.TO (Global X Crude Oil ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUC.TO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Solactive Light Sweet Crude Oil Winter MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while REMX is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HUC.TO returned 7.60%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for REMX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HUC.TO charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.
Performance
HUC.TO vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HUC.TO is traded in CAD, while REMX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the REMX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUC.TO achieves a 30.77% return, which is significantly higher than REMX's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, HUC.TO has outperformed REMX with an annualized return of 7.60%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.21% annualized return.
HUC.TO
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 27.36%
- YTD
- 30.77%
- 1Y
- 18.41%
- 3Y*
- 6.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
REMX
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -24.21%
- 6M
- -17.75%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 53.88%
- 3Y*
- -2.32%
- 5Y*
- -1.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.21%
HUC.TO vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUC.TO Global X Crude Oil ETF | 30.77% | -13.63% | 7.23% | -2.89% | 26.25% | 57.81% | -21.10% | 19.75% | -11.68% | -3.47% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 0.63% | 84.14% | -29.51% | -21.11% | -26.76% | 79.72% | 60.91% | -3.42% | -45.40% | 70.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUC.TO and REMX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010 | 0.23 |
The correlation between HUC.TO and REMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUC.TO vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
HUC.TO
REMX
HUC.TO vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Crude Oil ETF (HUC.TO) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUC.TO | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.20 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 1.69 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.35 | 5.12 | -2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUC.TO vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUC.TO drawdown since its inception was -88.50%, roughly equal to the maximum REMX drawdown of -85.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUC.TO and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUC.TO | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.50% | -85.86% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.90% | -32.03% | +14.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.83% | -57.43% | +33.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | -69.70% | +38.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.56% | -69.70% | +8.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.72% | -51.20% | -4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.75% | -58.86% | +6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.87% | 10.55% | -2.68% |
Volatility
HUC.TO vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Crude Oil ETF (HUC.TO) is 5.57%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that HUC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUC.TO | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 11.58% | -6.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.06% | 37.39% | -15.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.33% | 49.73% | -24.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 41.05% | -13.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.94% | 37.62% | -8.68% |
HUC.TO vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUC.TO has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUC.TO vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
HUC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUC.TO Global X Crude Oil ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.79% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUC.TO and REMX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for HUC.TO.
HUC.TO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. HUC.TO tracks Solactive Light Sweet Crude Oil Winter MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for HUC.TO and 0.59% for REMX.
Find the right allocation for HUC.TO and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer