HUBG vs. MTG
HUBG (Hub Group, Inc.) and MTG (MGIC Investment Corporation) are both stocks. HUBG operates in Integrated Freight & Logistics (Industrials), while MTG operates in Insurance - Specialty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, HUBG returned 9.03%/yr vs 17.34%/yr for MTG. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HUBG vs. MTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUBG achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than MTG's 3.98% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBG has underperformed MTG with an annualized return of 9.03%, while MTG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.34% annualized return.
HUBG
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- 6M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- 40.29%
- 3Y*
- 2.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- 9.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.14%
MTG
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 1Y
- 16.88%
- 3Y*
- 24.25%
- 5Y*
- 19.55%
- 10Y*
- 17.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
HUBG Hub Group, Inc. | $34.30M | $36.13M | $35.09M |
| $53.26M | $53.89M | $51.68M |
HUBG vs. MTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBG Hub Group, Inc. | 9.91% | -3.07% | -1.99% | 15.66% | -5.64% | 47.79% | 11.13% | 38.36% | -22.61% | 9.49% |
MTG MGIC Investment Corporation | 3.98% | 25.88% | 25.68% | 52.41% | -7.50% | 17.19% | -9.20% | 36.71% | -25.87% | 38.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUBG and MTG is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 1996 | 0.28 |
The correlation between HUBG and MTG shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HUBG:
$2.82B
MTG:
$6.16B
HUBG:
$1.74
MTG:
$3.19
HUBG:
26.73
MTG:
9.40
HUBG:
0.69
MTG:
0.60
HUBG:
0.75
MTG:
5.57
HUBG:
1.65
MTG:
1.26
HUBG:
$3.73B
MTG:
$1.20B
HUBG:
$1.82B
MTG:
$821.79M
HUBG:
$337.50M
MTG:
$681.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUBG vs. MTG — Risk / Return Rank
HUBG
MTG
HUBG vs. MTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) and MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUBG | MTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.18 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.33 | 2.41 | -0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUBG vs. MTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUBG drawdown since its inception was -89.13%, smaller than the maximum MTG drawdown of -98.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBG and MTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUBG | MTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.13% | -98.86% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.62% | -15.79% | -19.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.84% | -15.79% | -25.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.84% | -30.08% | -10.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.84% | -68.14% | +27.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.85% | -52.15% | +41.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.92% | -52.50% | +26.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.91% | 7.75% | +7.16% |
Volatility
HUBG vs. MTG - Volatility Comparison
Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) has a higher volatility of 11.73% compared to MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) at 5.82%. This indicates that HUBG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUBG | MTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.73% | 5.82% | +5.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.34% | 17.45% | +18.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.17% | 23.29% | +18.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.13% | 25.15% | +8.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.72% | 37.03% | -2.31% |
Dividends
HUBG vs. MTG - Dividend Comparison
HUBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than MTG's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBG Hub Group, Inc. | 1.07% | 1.17% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTG MGIC Investment Corporation | 2.00% | 1.92% | 2.07% | 2.23% | 2.77% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 0.85% |
Financials
HUBG vs. MTG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hub Group, Inc. and MGIC Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HUBG vs. MTG - Profitability Comparison
HUBG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hub Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 76.36M and revenue of 934.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.2%.
MTG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MGIC Investment Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 295.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HUBG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hub Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 39.44M and revenue of 934.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
MTG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MGIC Investment Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 295.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
HUBG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hub Group, Inc. reported a net income of 28.55M and revenue of 934.50M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
MTG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MGIC Investment Corporation reported a net income of 182.15M and revenue of 295.39M, resulting in a net margin of 61.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HUBG and MTG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUBG has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to MTG (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBG dropped -89.13% vs MTG's -98.86%.
HUBG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUBG and MTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer