PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTWG.L vs. RNRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTWG.L vs. RNRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RNRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HTWG.L is traded in GBp, while RNRG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RNRG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTWG.L achieves a 24.40% return, which is significantly higher than RNRG.L's 8.57% return.


HTWG.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
-14.94%
6M
9.66%
YTD
24.40%
1Y
51.40%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
-0.78%
10Y*

RNRG.L

1D
-0.22%
1M
-4.20%
6M
3.19%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
0.32%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTWG.L vs. RNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HTWG.L
L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF
24.40%30.68%-6.72%-8.50%-29.54%-2.89%
RNRG.L
Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.57%24.50%-21.66%-19.22%-0.15%-2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between HTWG.L and RNRG.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2021

0.62

The correlation between HTWG.L and RNRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTWG.L vs. RNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTWG.L
HTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

RNRG.L
RNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTWG.L vs. RNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HTWG.LRNRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.88

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.67

6.81

-0.15

HTWG.L vs. RNRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the RNRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTWG.L and RNRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HTWG.L vs. RNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTWG.L drawdown since its inception was -65.19%, which is greater than RNRG.L's maximum drawdown of -53.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTWG.L and RNRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTWG.LRNRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.19%

-53.69%

-11.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.83%

-13.63%

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.88%

-36.82%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.61%

-27.63%

-3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.70%

-29.00%

-15.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.69%

3.77%

+3.92%

Volatility

HTWG.L vs. RNRG.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.52% compared to Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RNRG.L) at 4.69%. This indicates that HTWG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTWG.LRNRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.52%

4.69%

+6.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.29%

13.49%

+8.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.34%

17.09%

+14.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.69%

19.42%

+7.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.88%

19.42%

+7.46%

HTWG.L vs. RNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTWG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than RNRG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTWG.L vs. RNRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HTWG.L nor RNRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HTWG.L and RNRG.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HTWG.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HTWG.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RNRG.L.

HTWG.L tracks Solactive Hydrogen Economy Index NTR, while RNRG.L tracks Indxx Renewable Energy Producers v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HTWG.L and 0.50% for RNRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTWG.L and RNRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer