PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTWG.L vs. LUK2.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTWG.L vs. LUK2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF (LUK2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTWG.L achieves a 30.29% return, which is significantly higher than LUK2.L's 10.52% return.


HTWG.L

1D
-2.57%
1M
-10.03%
6M
17.89%
YTD
30.29%
1Y
59.88%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*

LUK2.L

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.70%
6M
5.28%
YTD
10.52%
1Y
34.49%
3Y*
23.66%
5Y*
16.82%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTWG.L vs. LUK2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HTWG.L
L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF
30.29%30.68%-6.72%-8.50%-29.54%-30.05%
LUK2.L
L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF
10.52%43.73%9.81%6.59%3.75%32.40%

Correlation

The correlation between HTWG.L and LUK2.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2021

0.49

The correlation between HTWG.L and LUK2.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTWG.L vs. LUK2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTWG.L
HTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

LUK2.L
LUK2.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LUK2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUK2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUK2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LUK2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUK2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTWG.L vs. LUK2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF (LUK2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HTWG.LLUK2.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

1.84

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

5.39

+2.68

HTWG.L vs. LUK2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the LUK2.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTWG.L and LUK2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HTWG.L vs. LUK2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTWG.L drawdown since its inception was -65.19%, which is greater than LUK2.L's maximum drawdown of -58.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTWG.L and LUK2.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTWG.LLUK2.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.19%

-58.84%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.22%

-18.55%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.88%

-25.42%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.98%

-25.42%

-31.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.37%

-8.09%

-20.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.71%

-10.68%

-34.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.39%

6.34%

+1.05%

Volatility

HTWG.L vs. LUK2.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.13% compared to L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF (LUK2.L) at 6.11%. This indicates that HTWG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUK2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTWG.LLUK2.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.13%

6.11%

+5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.95%

19.64%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.07%

22.61%

+8.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.64%

25.61%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.84%

29.65%

-2.81%

HTWG.L vs. LUK2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTWG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than LUK2.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTWG.L vs. LUK2.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HTWG.L nor LUK2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HTWG.L and LUK2.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HTWG.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HTWG.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for LUK2.L.

HTWG.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while LUK2.L is Technology Equities. HTWG.L tracks Solactive Hydrogen Economy Index NTR, while LUK2.L tracks L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HTWG.L and 0.50% for LUK2.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTWG.L and LUK2.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer