PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTWG.L vs. JEDI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTWG.L vs. JEDI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HTWG.L is traded in GBp, while JEDI.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the JEDI.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTWG.L achieves a 53.24% return, which is significantly lower than JEDI.DE's 75.60% return.


HTWG.L

1D
-2.52%
1M
4.11%
YTD
53.24%
6M
46.92%
1Y
109.84%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*

JEDI.DE

1D
1.44%
1M
22.47%
YTD
75.60%
6M
95.76%
1Y
210.96%
3Y*
65.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTWG.L vs. JEDI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HTWG.L
L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF
53.24%30.68%-6.72%-8.50%-8.76%
JEDI.DE
VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF
75.60%81.10%45.51%6.38%8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between HTWG.L and JEDI.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022

0.52

The correlation between HTWG.L and JEDI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTWG.L vs. JEDI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTWG.L
HTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

JEDI.DE
JEDI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
JEDI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEDI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEDI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JEDI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEDI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTWG.L vs. JEDI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTWG.LJEDI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.58

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.22

9.25

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.31

30.27

-10.96

HTWG.L vs. JEDI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is comparable to the JEDI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTWG.L and JEDI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTWG.LJEDI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80

4.83

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

1.64

-1.73

Drawdowns

HTWG.L vs. JEDI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTWG.L drawdown since its inception was -63.70%, which is greater than JEDI.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTWG.L and JEDI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTWG.LJEDI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.70%

-27.95%

-35.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.13%

-22.67%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.33%

-27.95%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.16%

-13.91%

+1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.90%

-7.54%

-35.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

6.94%

-1.27%

Volatility

HTWG.L vs. JEDI.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) is 11.24%, while VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE) has a volatility of 18.17%. This indicates that HTWG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEDI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTWG.LJEDI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.24%

18.17%

-6.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.29%

33.76%

-15.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.73%

43.39%

-14.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.15%

31.95%

-5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.49%

31.95%

-5.46%

HTWG.L vs. JEDI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTWG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than JEDI.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTWG.L vs. JEDI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither HTWG.L nor JEDI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HTWG.L and JEDI.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HTWG.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HTWG.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JEDI.DE.

HTWG.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while JEDI.DE is Industrials Equities. HTWG.L tracks Solactive Hydrogen Economy Index NTR, while JEDI.DE tracks MVIS Global Space Industry ESG. They also come from different issuers: L&G and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HTWG.L and 0.55% for JEDI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTWG.L and JEDI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer