PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTWG.L vs. IUSA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTWG.L vs. IUSA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist (IUSA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HTWG.L is traded in GBp, while IUSA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IUSA.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTWG.L achieves a 53.24% return, which is significantly higher than IUSA.DE's 10.54% return.


HTWG.L

1D
-2.52%
1M
4.11%
YTD
53.24%
6M
46.92%
1Y
109.84%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*

IUSA.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
5.43%
YTD
10.54%
6M
10.39%
1Y
29.19%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
15.07%
10Y*
16.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTWG.L vs. IUSA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HTWG.L
L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF
53.24%30.68%-6.72%-8.50%-29.54%-27.07%
IUSA.DE
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist
10.54%10.30%26.72%20.15%-9.49%27.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HTWG.L and IUSA.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2021

0.53

The correlation between HTWG.L and IUSA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTWG.L vs. IUSA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTWG.L
HTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSA.DE
IUSA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTWG.L vs. IUSA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist (IUSA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTWG.LIUSA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.48

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.22

4.14

+3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.31

14.87

+4.45

HTWG.L vs. IUSA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the IUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTWG.L and IUSA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTWG.LIUSA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80

2.64

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

1.01

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.76

-0.85

Drawdowns

HTWG.L vs. IUSA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTWG.L drawdown since its inception was -63.70%, which is greater than IUSA.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTWG.L and IUSA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTWG.LIUSA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.70%

-34.69%

-29.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.13%

-7.03%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.33%

-22.08%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.98%

-22.08%

-34.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.16%

-0.26%

-11.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.90%

-4.71%

-38.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

1.96%

+3.71%

Volatility

HTWG.L vs. IUSA.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist (IUSA.DE) at 3.03%. This indicates that HTWG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTWG.LIUSA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.24%

3.03%

+8.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.29%

7.43%

+10.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.73%

11.01%

+17.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.15%

14.74%

+11.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.49%

15.95%

+10.54%

HTWG.L vs. IUSA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTWG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSA.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTWG.L vs. IUSA.DE - Dividend Comparison

HTWG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUSA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTWG.L
L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUSA.DE
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.99%1.08%1.07%1.35%1.54%1.16%1.62%1.66%2.00%2.09%1.50%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


HTWG.L and IUSA.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUSA.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSA.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HTWG.L.

HTWG.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while IUSA.DE is S&P 500. HTWG.L tracks Solactive Hydrogen Economy Index NTR, while IUSA.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HTWG.L and 0.07% for IUSA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTWG.L and IUSA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer