PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTWG.L vs. DS2P.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTWG.L vs. DS2P.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTWG.L achieves a 24.40% return, which is significantly higher than DS2P.L's -11.00% return.


HTWG.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
-14.94%
6M
9.66%
YTD
24.40%
1Y
51.40%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
-0.78%
10Y*

DS2P.L

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.79%
6M
-1.11%
YTD
-11.00%
1Y
-7.47%
3Y*
-24.32%
5Y*
-20.16%
10Y*
-23.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTWG.L vs. DS2P.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HTWG.L
L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF
24.40%30.68%-6.72%-8.50%-29.54%-30.05%
DS2P.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-11.00%-29.68%-28.35%-29.73%13.75%-30.50%

Correlation

The correlation between HTWG.L and DS2P.L is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2021

-0.56

The correlation between HTWG.L and DS2P.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.56 to -0.48 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTWG.L vs. DS2P.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTWG.L
HTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DS2P.L
DS2P.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTWG.L vs. DS2P.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HTWG.LDS2P.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.99

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

-0.27

+2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.67

-0.58

+7.25

HTWG.L vs. DS2P.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTWG.L and DS2P.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HTWG.L vs. DS2P.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTWG.L drawdown since its inception was -65.19%, smaller than the maximum DS2P.L drawdown of -99.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTWG.L and DS2P.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTWG.LDS2P.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.19%

-99.62%

+34.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.83%

-27.26%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.88%

-67.63%

+35.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.98%

-78.85%

+21.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.61%

-99.59%

+67.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.70%

-89.22%

+44.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.69%

12.82%

-5.13%

Volatility

HTWG.L vs. DS2P.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.52% compared to L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) at 9.45%. This indicates that HTWG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DS2P.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTWG.LDS2P.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.52%

9.45%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.29%

28.11%

-5.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.34%

34.11%

-2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.69%

36.73%

-10.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.88%

38.73%

-11.85%

HTWG.L vs. DS2P.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTWG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DS2P.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTWG.L vs. DS2P.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HTWG.L nor DS2P.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HTWG.L and DS2P.L have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HTWG.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HTWG.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DS2P.L.

HTWG.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while DS2P.L is Leveraged Equities. HTWG.L tracks Solactive Hydrogen Economy Index NTR, while DS2P.L tracks ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HTWG.L and 0.50% for DS2P.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTWG.L and DS2P.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer