HTWG.L vs. COMF.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HTWG.L (L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF) and COMF.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTWG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Hydrogen Economy Index NTR, while COMF.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HTWG.L returned 0.14%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for COMF.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HTWG.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for COMF.L.

Performance

HTWG.L vs. COMF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HTWG.L is traded in GBp, while COMF.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COMF.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTWG.L achieves a 30.29% return, which is significantly higher than COMF.L's 14.74% return.

HTWG.L

• 1D: -2.57%
• 1M: -10.03%
• 6M: 17.89%
• YTD: 30.29%
• 1Y: 59.88%
• 3Y*: 13.36%
• 5Y*: 0.14%
• 10Y*: —

COMF.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.01%
• 6M: 9.74%
• YTD: 14.74%
• 1Y: 22.89%
• 3Y*: 10.18%
• 5Y*: 11.54%
• 10Y*: 7.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTWG.L vs. COMF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HTWG.L L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF	30.29%	30.68%	-6.72%	-8.50%	-29.54%	-30.05%
COMF.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF	14.74%	8.14%	6.96%	-11.05%	32.85%	26.63%

Correlation

The correlation between HTWG.L and COMF.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2021	0.11

Return for Risk

HTWG.L vs. COMF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTWG.L

HTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
HTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
HTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
HTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
HTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 57

COMF.L

COMF.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
COMF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
COMF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
COMF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
COMF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
COMF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTWG.L vs. COMF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HTWG.L	COMF.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.58	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.10	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.28	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	2.19	+0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.08	6.78	+1.29

HTWG.L vs. COMF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the COMF.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTWG.L and COMF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HTWG.L vs. COMF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTWG.L drawdown since its inception was -65.19%, which is greater than COMF.L's maximum drawdown of -50.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTWG.L and COMF.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTWG.L	COMF.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.19%	-50.51%	-14.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.22%	-10.49%	-9.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.88%	-13.06%	-18.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.98%	-23.88%	-33.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.37%	-7.50%	-20.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.71%	-23.27%	-21.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.39%	3.39%	+4.00%

Volatility

HTWG.L vs. COMF.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.13% compared to L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that HTWG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTWG.L	COMF.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.13%	3.57%	+7.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.95%	12.14%	+9.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.07%	14.53%	+16.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.64%	15.17%	+11.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.84%	14.17%	+12.67%

HTWG.L vs. COMF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTWG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than COMF.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTWG.L vs. COMF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HTWG.L nor COMF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTWG.L and COMF.L in my portfolio?

HTWG.L and COMF.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HTWG.L or COMF.L?

On fees, COMF.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTWG.L or COMF.L?

COMF.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HTWG.L.

What is the main difference between HTWG.L and COMF.L?

HTWG.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while COMF.L is Commodities. HTWG.L tracks Solactive Hydrogen Economy Index NTR, while COMF.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HTWG.L and 0.30% for COMF.L.